摘要
犬慢性肠病(CE)是一种异质性疾病,临床结局差异较大。本研究旨在识别与CE严重程度及治疗结局相关的粪便微生物组和代谢组特征。采用16S rRNA基因测序和基于GC-MS的非靶向代谢组学方法,对CE患犬(n = 56)、急性腹泻患犬(n = 8)和健康对照犬(n = 126)的粪便样本进行分析。与其他组相比,CE患犬的微生物多样性显著降低,无监督围绕中心点划分聚类在CE队列中识别出两个微生物组聚类。聚类2以菌群失调为特征,链球菌属、肠球菌属和克雷伯菌属富集,而产生短链脂肪酸的梭杆菌属和布劳特菌属耗竭。在基线犬慢性肠病临床活动指数(CCECAI)> 3的患犬中,聚类1的12只犬中有10只(83.3%)在治疗后达到缓解(CCECAI ≤ 3),而聚类2的18只犬中仅有7只(38.9%;p = 0.0256)达到缓解。聚类1治疗后的CCECAI评分显著下降(p = 0.0005),而聚类2则无显著变化(p = 0.077)。两聚类间粪便丙酸和犬尿喹啉酸水平也存在差异。这些发现提示,肠道微生物群及相关代谢物可能参与CE严重程度和治疗结局的差异。
引言
犬慢性肠病(CE)是一种以持续或反复发作的消化系统症状持续超过三周为特征的胃肠道疾病,主要临床体征包括腹泻、呕吐和厌食(Allenspach and Mochel 2022)。CE传统上根据对阶梯式治疗干预的反应分为食物反应性肠病(FRE)、微生物群反应性肠病(MRE)、免疫抑制剂反应性肠病(IRE)和无反应性肠病(NRE)(Dandrieux and Mansfield 2019; Rodrigues et al. 2025)。然而,这些治疗反应分类与疾病严重程度、组织病理学发现或潜在病因并不一致对应(Dandrieux 2016; Jergens and Heilmann 2022),且分类只能在序贯治疗试验后回顾性确定。这一局限性凸显了需要能够在诊断时表征疾病表型的补充性分层方法。
肠道微生物群构成一个动态的胃肠道生态系统,在宿主免疫发育、代谢稳态和众多生理过程中发挥关键作用(Pilla and Suchodolski, 2020; Gacesa et al. 2022; Shoubridge et al. 2022)。其作用通过免疫刺激、调节肠道结构、竞争性排斥病原体以及产生短链脂肪酸(SCFAs)等关键代谢物来介导(Guard et al. 2015)。理解宿主、肠道微生物群及其代谢终产物之间的复杂相互作用,为胃肠道疾病的病理生理学提供了重要见解。与人类炎症性肠病(IBD)类似(Franzosa et al. 2019; Andoh and Nishida 2022),犬肠病以显著的菌群失调为特征,包括微生物多样性降低、群落组成结构改变和核心分类群变化,并伴随粪便代谢组谱的改变(Dandrieux 2016; Fritsch et al. 2022; Kaga et al. 2024; Chen et al. 2025)。
基于这些观察,利用肠道微生物组特征的非侵入性诊断方法已被提出作为人类IBD检测的有前景工具(Zheng et al. 2024),多项研究也提出了适用于犬CE的基于微生物组的诊断标准(AlShawaqfeh et al. 2017; Jergens and Heilmann 2022)。然而,CE是一种受年龄、品种、饮食、临床病史和疾病表现个体差异影响的多因素疾病(Galler et al. 2022; Jergens and Heilmann 2022; Yu et al. 2023)。由于非侵入性方法通常提供的预后信息有限,识别反映疾病严重程度并预测治疗结局的微生物组和代谢组特征仍是改善临床管理的优先事项。
因此,本研究的主要目的是表征与犬CE相关的肠道微生物群特征,基于微生物组组成将CE病例分层为具有生物学意义的亚组,并探讨这些亚组的代谢组学相关性及其与疾病严重程度和治疗结局的潜在关联。因急性发作胃肠道症状就诊于初级保健诊所的急性腹泻患犬被纳入作为对照组,以区分CE特异性慢性菌群失调与急性胃肠道疾病相关的短暂微生物组扰动。
材料与方法
研究人群与采样
2022年1月至2023年12月期间,本研究对慢性肠病患犬(CE组)、急性腹泻患犬(AD组)和临床健康对照犬(HC组)的粪便样本进行了分析。这些样本最初分别作为东京农工大学(TUAT)和森永乳业株式会社开展的独立研究项目的一部分采集。
从日本动物转诊医疗中心(JARMEC)招募了56只出现慢性胃肠道疾病临床症状的客户拥有犬。主治兽医基于临床症状、全血细胞计数、血清生化、腹部超声、内镜活检以及对饲养条件、饮食与用药史和既往疾病的综合评估,将犬诊断为慢性肠病(CE组)。根据这些临床检查结果,排除了慢性胃肠道症状的胃肠外病因,包括肾上腺皮质功能减退、胰腺外分泌功能不全、慢性胰腺炎和原发性感染性肠病;在临床有指征时进行了特异性激素检测。疾病严重程度采用犬慢性肠病临床活动指数(CCECAI;Allenspach等,2007)进行分级。CE研究方案经东京农工大学农学部动物实验与研究伦理委员会审查批准(批准号0020008),并经由森永乳业株式会社伦理委员会批准(批准号21-001)。
急性腹泻犬(AD组;n=8)和临床健康犬(HC组;n=126)的粪便样本最初作为森永乳业株式会社开展的研究项目的一部分采集。AD组的粪便样本来自小田动物医院兽医诊断为急性腹泻的客户拥有犬。急性腹泻定义为胃肠道症状持续少于三周。临床记录中无法获得腹泻类型(出血性 vs 非出血性)的详细分类。AD组所有犬均为私人所有,生活在不同的家庭环境中,饲喂各种商品化日粮。HC组的粪便样本来自多家商业繁殖设施中在常规管理过程中饲养的犬。AD和HC研究方案经森永乳业株式会社伦理委员会审查批准(批准号21-004)。
在本研究中,将来自东京农工大学主导的CE研究和森永主导的AD/HC研究获得的粪便样本整合并一起分析,作为二次分析,以研究三个临床组的粪便微生物组和代谢组谱。本研究未专门进行额外的动物干预或样本采集。所有粪便样本在分析前保存于−80°C。在样本采集前获得了所有犬主或设施管理者的书面知情同意。
粪便DNA提取和16S rRNA测序
粪便DNA按先前描述的方法提取(Komatsu等,2022)。简言之,将500 μL GuSCN溶液中的粪便样本用玻璃珠(300 mg,直径0.1 mm)在FastPrep-24 5 G匀浆仪(MP Biomedicals LLC,Santa Ana,CA,USA)上以速度设定5裂解45 s,冰上冷却间隔5 min。12,000 rpm离心5 min后,取200 μL上清液,使用GENE PREP STAR PI-480仪器(Kurabo Industries Ltd.,Osaka,Japan)按制造商方案提取DNA。细菌16S rRNA基因的V3–V4区域在Illumina NextSeq 1000平台上使用NextSeq 1000/2000 P1试剂盒(600个循环;Illumina,San Diego,CA,USA)进行双端测序。
序列数据使用QIIME2版本2022.8进行分析(Bolyen等,2019)。对去多路复用的reads进行过滤、去噪、合并和去除嵌合体处理,并使用DADA2生成扩增子序列变异(ASVs)(Callahan等,2016)。使用Greengenes2数据库版本2022.10进行分类学注释(McDonald等,2024)。Alpha多样性指数和基于Bray–Curtis相异性的主坐标分析(PCoA)在QIIME2中计算。
肠道微生物群聚类
使用R版本4.3.2(R Foundation for Statistical Computing,Vienna,Austria)及philentropy版本0.9.0(Drost 2018)、cluster版本2.1.8.1(Maechler等,2019)和fpc版本2.2-13(Hennig 2024)软件包,在属水平对肠道微生物群谱进行聚类。计算样本间的Jensen–Shannon距离(JSD)矩阵,并应用围绕中心点划分(PAM)聚类。使用Calinski–Harabasz指数确定最佳聚类数。
用于非靶向代谢组学分析的粪便样本制备
称取30毫克粪便样品放入2毫升微量管中,加入15毫克0.2毫米玻璃珠和150微升PBS。混合物以5,500转/分钟均质两次,每次20秒,并于4°C下以21,000×g离心5分钟。上清液通过0.2微米醋酸纤维素膜过滤器(ϕ13毫米;Toyo Roshi Kaisha, Ltd.,东京,日本)过滤。取50微升过滤后的上清液与250微升甲醇、氯仿和水三元溶剂系统(2.5:1:1;Fujifilm Wako,大阪,日本)以及5微升1毫克/毫升2-异丙基苹果酸(Fujifilm Wako)作为内标混合。混合物在1,200转/分钟和37°C下孵育30分钟,然后在4°C下以16,000×g离心5分钟。从225微升所得上清液中加入200微升蒸馏水,再于4°C下以16,000×g离心5分钟后,收集250微升上清液。使用离心蒸发器CVE-2200(东京理化器械株式会社,东京,日本)部分去除溶剂25分钟。浓缩物在−80°C下冷冻,随后使用真空冷冻干燥机FDU-1200(东京理化器械株式会社)冻干16小时。冻干样品用40微升20毫克/毫升甲氧胺盐酸盐(Fujifilm Wako)的吡啶(Fujifilm Wako)溶液复溶,并在1,200转/分钟和30°C下孵育90分钟。随后加入20微升N-甲基-N-三甲基硅基三氟乙酰胺(MSTFA;Thermo Fisher Scientific,沃尔瑟姆,MA,美国),样品在1,200转/分钟和37°C下孵育45分钟以完成衍生化。
非靶向GC-MS分析
GC-MS分析按先前描述并稍作修改进行(Li等,2024)。将1微升各衍生化样品注入配备AOC-20i自动进样器(岛津公司)的GC-MS QP2020 NX系统(岛津公司,京都,日本)。色谱分离在DB-5毛细管柱(1.00微米膜厚;Agilent Technologies, Inc.,圣克拉拉,CA,美国)上进行。进样口温度维持在280°C,载气恒流为5毫升/分钟。电子电离在70 eV下进行,质谱每0.2秒在m/z 45–600范围内采集。柱温程序如下:初始在100°C保持4分钟,以10°C/分钟升温至320°C,最后在320°C保持11分钟。代谢物鉴定使用MS-DIAL 4.90版本结合岛津Smart Metabolite Database(OA_TMS_DB5_37min_V3_Scan;岛津公司)进行。源自正构烷烃系列的保留指数支持峰对齐和注释。数据处理参数设置为m/z范围45–600 Da,保留指数容差20,质荷比容差0.5 Da,最低EI谱图相似度和总体鉴定评分阈值均为70。原始峰强度以内标信号归一化,当单个代谢物检测到多个硅烷化衍生物时,仅保留最丰富的衍生物用于分析。
通过GC-MS定量粪便SCFA
粪便短链脂肪酸(SCFAs;甲酸、乙酸、丙酸、丁酸和戊酸)通过GC-MS按先前描述并稍作修改进行定量(Furuhashi等,2018)。简言之,称取35毫克粪便样品放入2毫升微量管中,加入15毫克0.2毫米玻璃珠和1毫升10%异丁醇。混合物以5,500转/分钟均质两次,每次20秒,并于4°C下以21,000×g离心5分钟。从675微升上清液中加入20微升3-甲基戊酸(内标)、125微升20 mM NaOH和400微升氯仿。涡旋并在4°C下以21,000×g离心2分钟后,将400微升上层相转移至新管中,加入70微升异丁醇、100微升吡啶和80微升无DNase/RNase蒸馏水。在开盖状态下加入50微升氯甲酸异丁酯3分钟以允许气体逸出,随后加入150微升己烷。涡旋并在4°C下以21,000×g离心2分钟后,将80微升上层有机相转移至GC样品瓶进行分析。
GC-MS测量通过将1微升衍生化样品注入配备HP-5MS毛细管柱(30米×0.25毫米内径,0.25微米膜厚;Agilent Technologies, Inc.)的GC-MS QP2020 NX系统进行。进样口温度设为250°C,载气流量为5毫升/分钟。柱温程序包括初始在50°C保持5分钟,以5°C/分钟升温至150°C,以40°C/分钟升温至330°C,最后在330°C保持1分钟。质谱在电子电离模式下以70 eV在m/z 30–600范围内采集。SCFA浓度由归一化至内标的提取离子色谱峰面积确定。
统计分析
组间α多样性指数和细菌相对丰度的比较采用Kruskal–Wallis检验,随后进行Mann–Whitney U检验,多重比较采用Bonferroni校正。β多样性通过置换多元方差分析(PERMANOVA)评估,使用R包psych 2.5.6版(Makowski 2018)和SPSS 30.0版(IBM Corp.,Armonk,NY,USA)。线性判别分析效应量(LEfSe)使用R包microeco 1.15.0版(Liu et al. 2025)进行。对于代谢组学分析,主成分分析(PCA)在R 4.5.1版中进行。组间差异代谢物采用|log₂倍数变化| > 1和错误发现率(FDR)< 0.05的阈值进行鉴定,FDR由Benjamini–Hochberg法计算。临床和人口学特征(年龄、体重、血清白蛋白、CRP和用药前状态)在聚类间进行比较,连续变量采用Mann–Whitney U检验,分类变量采用Fisher精确检验。由于CE犬在初次和随访评估之间接受了多样化和个体化的治疗,治疗反应仅基于CCECAI变化进行评估,而不考虑所采用的具体治疗方案。治疗结局分析仅限于同时具有治疗前和治疗后CCECAI数据且基线CCECAI > 3的犬,以排除初诊时已处于缓解期的个体,并使治疗反应的评估具有意义。缓解定义为随访时CCECAI ≤ 3;此外还进行了以CCECAI降低≥ 75%作为替代缓解标准的补充分析。聚类间缓解率的差异采用Fisher精确检验评估。各聚类内治疗前后CCECAI评分采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较。聚类间治疗后CCECAI评分采用Mann–Whitney U检验比较。聚类归属与基线CCECAI严重程度之间的关联采用累积logit有序logistic回归评估,并校正年龄、性别和绝育状态。为评估HC组比较的稳健性,进行了敏感性分析,从HC组中排除年龄≤ 3月龄的幼犬(n = 29)。整个研究中p值 < 0.05被认为具有统计学显著性。
结果
临床特征
共纳入56只诊断为CE的犬,以及8只诊断为急性腹泻的犬(AD组)和126只临床健康犬(HC组)。所有组的详细个体特征见补充表S1–S3。CE组中最常见的品种为柴犬(n = 8)、混种犬(n = 7)、玩具贵宾犬(n = 4)和腊肠犬(n = 3)。在56只CE犬中,33只为雌性(29只已绝育),22只为雄性(14只已去势),1只未记录;初诊时平均年龄为8.20 ± 3.52岁(n = 55,排除1只年龄未记录的犬)。基线血清白蛋白中位数为2.10 g/dL(IQR:1.80–2.80),有可用数据的54只犬中有18只(33.3%)存在低白蛋白血症(白蛋白 < 2.0 g/dL)。基线CRP中位数为0.42 mg/dL(IQR:0.14–1.39)。56只犬中有23只(41.1%)在转诊和基线粪便采样前已接受初级保健兽医给予的类固醇/免疫抑制剂或抗生素治疗。
健康犬、急性腹泻犬和慢性肠病犬的肠道菌群和粪便代谢组谱存在差异
从193份样本中共获得3,180,943条序列读数(均值 ± SD:每份样本16,481 ± 11,572条读数),产生1,166个ASV特征。三组间Chao1和Shannon α多样性指数均存在显著差异,HC组的值显著高于AD组和CE组(图1A)。基于Greengenes2提供的种水平注释的Bray–Curtis相异度的主坐标分析(PCoA)显示,HC组与AD组和CE组之间均存在明显分离(图1B;PERMANOVA F = 22.658,R2 = 0.193,p = 0.001)。在门水平上,所有组的优势菌门为Firmicutes_A、Firmicutes_D、Bacteroidota、Fusobacteriota、Firmicutes_C、Actinobacteriota和Proteobacteria(图1C)。在属水平上,Streptococcus在CE组中丰度最高,而Fusobacterium_A、Fusobacterium_B、Faecalibacterium、Peptacetobacter和Ligilactobacillus在HC组中更为普遍(图1D)。
[图:(A)健康犬(HC)、犬的粪便菌群α多样性比较(Chao1指数,上;Shannon指数,下)]

对于代谢组学分析,可获得CE组44份和AD组7份粪便样本。共鉴定出206种代谢物,并根据人类代谢组数据库超类进行分类(图2A)。PCA未显示AD组和CE组之间的明显分离(图2B),可能反映了CE队列内部的异质性。然而,火山图分析鉴定出两组间有42种代谢物存在显著差异(图2C),促使通过基于微生物组的亚组划分进一步研究CE组内的代谢组学变异。
[图:(A)基于人类代谢组数据库超类对已鉴定粪便代谢物的分类。(B)PCA图显示]

PAM聚类在慢性肠病组内鉴定出两种不同的微生物组亚型
为探究CE犬肠道微生物组组成的异质性,在属水平上采用Jensen–Shannon距离进行PAM聚类。基于最高的Calinski–Harabasz指数(补充图S1),所有CE个体被分配至聚类1(n = 22)或聚类2(n = 34)(图3A)。校正年龄、性别和绝育状态的序数逻辑回归显示,与聚类1相比,聚类2犬的基线CCECAI评分倾向于更高,但未达到统计学显著性(OR = 1.79,95% CI:0.60–5.38,p = 0.298;图3B)。包括年龄、性别、体重、血清白蛋白、CRP和用药前状态在内的临床和人口学特征在聚类间无显著差异(表1)。年龄、性别和绝育状态均与基线CCECAI严重程度无显著关联,提示观察到的聚类间疾病严重程度差异未受这些人口学因素混杂。为评估治疗反应并排除初诊时已处于缓解期的个体,分析仅限于基线CCECAI > 3且有治疗后数据的犬(聚类1:n = 12;聚类2:n = 18;补充表S3)。其中,聚类1的12只犬中有10只(83.3%)在治疗后达到缓解(CCECAI ≤ 3),而聚类2的18只犬中仅有7只(38.9%;Fisher精确检验,OR = 7.86,95% CI:1.31–47.05,p = 0.0256;表2和图3C)。聚类1治疗后CCECAI评分显著降低(中位变化:−4.5,IQR:−7.0至−4.0;Wilcoxon符号秩检验,p = 0.0005),而聚类2未显著降低(中位变化:−3.0,IQR:−5.8至0.8;p = 0.077),且聚类1治疗后CCECAI评分显著低于聚类2(中位数:1.0 vs 6.0;Mann–Whitney U检验,p = 0.0152;图3C)。当以CCECAI降低≥ 75%作为替代缓解标准时,观察到一致的趋势(聚类1:7/12,58.3% vs 聚类2:6/18,33.3%),但未达到统计学显著性(Fisher精确检验,p = 0.264)。基线与随访CCECAI评估之间的中位间隔为14天(IQR:12–15;范围:7–60)。在治疗分析亚组中,基线体重、血清白蛋白、CRP和用药前状态在聚类间无显著差异(补充表S4),表明观察到的治疗结局差异并非归因于基线临床或用药失衡。在治疗分析亚组中,基线与随访评估之间给予的治疗类别分布(类固醇/免疫抑制剂、抗生素、益生菌和其他药物)在聚类间无显著差异(所有p > 0.05;表1和补充表S4),表明观察到的治疗结局差异并非归因于治疗方案的不同。
Table 1.. Clinical and demographic characteristics of CE dogs stratified by microbiome cluster.
| Cluster 1 ( n = 22) | Cluster 2 ( n = 34) | p -value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | Median (IQR) | 6.0 (4.0–10.0) | 9.0 (7.0–11.0) | 0.114 |
| Sex | Female/Male | 10/11 | 23/11 | 0.166 |
| Body weight (kg) | Median (IQR) | 5.50 (3.70–9.70) | 6.45 (4.00–8.60) | 0.763 |
| Serum albumin (g/dL) | Median (IQR) | 2.30 (1.90–3.10) | 2.10 (1.80–2.70) | 0.150 |
| Hypoalbuminemia | Albumin < 2.0 g/dL | 6/21 (28.6%) | 12/33 (36.4%) | 0.768 |
| CRP (mg/dL) | Median (IQR) | 0.52 (0.15–2.16) | 0.41 (0.21–1.22) | 0.690 |
| Baseline CCECAI | Median (IQR) | 4.0 (2.8–7.2) | 6.0 (4.0–12.0) | 0.131 |
| Pre-medication a | Yes | 10/22 (45.5%) | 13/34 (38.2%) | 0.781 |
| Mediation b | S/I | 16/21 (76.2%) | 27/33 (81.8%) | 0.733 |
| AB | 13/21 (61.9%) | 22/33 (66.7%) | 0.775 | |
| PB | 1/21 (4.8%) | 4/33 (12.1%) | 0.638 | |
| other | 10/21 (47.6%) | 15/33 (45.5%) | 1.000 |
Table 2.. Treatment outcomes in dogs with chronic enteropathy and baseline CCECAI > 3, stratified by microbiome cluster.
| Cluster 1 ( n = 12) | Cluster 2 ( n = 18) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CCECAI at initial presentation | Mild (4–5) | 5 | 6 |
| Moderate (6–8) | 4 | 4 | |
| Severe (9–11) | 1 | 1 | |
| Very severe (≥12) | 2 | 7 | |
| Median CCECAI (IQR) | 7.0 (4.0–8.2) | 7.5 (5.0–13.0) | |
| CCECAI at follow-up | Insignificant (0–3) | 10 | 7 |
| Mild (4–5) | 1 | 2 | |
| Moderate (6–8) | 1 | 2 | |
| Severe (9–11) | 0 | 2 | |
| Very severe (≥12) | 0 | 5 | |
| Median CCECAI (IQR) | 1.0 (0.0–3.0) | 6.0 (1.2–12.5) | |
| CCECAI change a median (IQR) | −4.5 (−7.0 to −4.0) | −3.0 (−5.8 to 0.8) | |
| Remission rate b | CCECAI ≤ 3 at follow-up | 10/12 (83.3%) * | 7/18 (38.9%) * |
| Treatment response c | Pre vs post (Wilcoxon) | p = 0.0005 † | p = 0.0773 (ns) |
| Post-treatment CCECAI d | Group comparison (Mann–Whitney) | p = 0.0152 ‡ |
[图:(A)基于初诊时粪便微生物群特征的PAM聚类结果双标图,显示聚类1(n =]

与HC组相比,Cluster 1和Cluster 2的α多样性均显著降低,其中Cluster 2的Chao1和Shannon指数值最低(图3D)。β多样性分析证实,HC组、Cluster 1和Cluster 2之间的微生物群落结构存在显著差异(图3E;PERMANOVA F = 26.778,R2 = 0.231,p = 0.001)。在属水平上,Cluster 2的特征为链球菌属相对丰度显著高于HC组和Cluster 1,而Phocaeicola_A_858004、Fusobacterium_A、Blautia_A_141781、Blautia_A_141780、Fusobacterium_B和Peptacetobacter的相对丰度较低(图3F)。LEfSe分析确定链球菌属、Enterococcus_H_360604、Clostridium_T和克雷伯菌属是Cluster 2菌群失调特征的关键贡献者,而Fusobacterium_A、Blautia_A_141781、Ruminococcus_B、Faecalimonas和Enterococcus_E为Cluster 1的特征菌群(图3G)。
Cluster 1与Cluster 2的粪便代谢组学特征存在差异
PCA显示Cluster 1与Cluster 2在代谢组学空间中存在明显分离(图4A)。火山图分析鉴定出两个聚类间存在显著差异的多种代谢物(图4B)。在靶向SCFAs中,Cluster 2的丙酸浓度显著低于Cluster 1,而甲酸、乙酸和丁酸浓度在两组间无显著差异(图4C)。
[图:(A)PCA图展示Cluster 1与Cluster 2之间粪便代谢组的变异。(B)火山图显示代]

讨论
本研究表明,患有CE的犬和患有急性腹泻的犬与健康对照相比表现出不同的粪便微生物组特征,以微生物多样性降低和群落组成改变为特征。基于粪便微生物群特征对CE病例进行无监督PAM聚类,识别出两个具有生物学意义的亚组,其在疾病严重程度、治疗反应和粪便代谢组学特征方面存在差异。促成这些差异的关键分类群包括链球菌属、Enterococcus_H_360604、Clostridium_T、Phocaeicola_A_858004、Fusobacterium_A和Blautia_A_141781。尽管在组水平上未观察到AD组与CE组之间明显的代谢组学分离,但这可能反映了CE队列存在显著的组内异质性,因为基于微生物组的亚组分析随后揭示出两个CE聚类之间的代谢组学差异比AD组与CE组整体之间的差异更为明显。这些发现表明,肠道微生物群结构及相关代谢物谱共同促进了犬CE疾病严重程度的变化。
粪便微生物群分析证实,健康犬、急性腹泻犬和CE犬之间的群落结构存在显著差异,印证了先前关于胃肠道疾病犬具有不同微生物谱和多样性降低的报道(AlShawaqfeh等,2017;Allenspach和Mochel,2022;Chen等,2025)。在CE队列内,这一模式延伸至聚类水平,Cluster 2的α多样性低于Cluster 1。在门水平上,健康犬的核心肠道微生物群以厚壁菌门、梭杆菌门、拟杆菌门、变形菌门和放线菌门为主,与先前基于焦磷酸测序的报道一致(Hand等,2013)。厚壁菌门在所有组中均为最丰富的门,包含在SCFA产生中具有明确作用的分类群,包括Faecalibacterium和Blautia,据报道这两者在CE犬中均减少(Pilla和Suchodolski,2020)。拟杆菌门主要参与多糖降解和乙酸产生(Mukhopadhya和Louis,2025),据报道其相对丰度在活动性肠道炎症期间降低(Shin等,2023;Ishikawa等,2024;Li等,2025)。放线菌门主要定植于小肠,通常在肠腔氧含量升高的条件下增加,如急性腹泻期间(Chung The和Le,2022)。值得注意的是,尽管存在长期菌群失调,CE组放线菌门的相对丰度仍低于AD组,这可能反映了慢性病程中肠道微环境的适应性转变。CE组还显示出最高比例的未分类分类群,可能表明正常核心微生物群逐渐侵蚀。
在慢性肠病(CE)犬中,特定细菌类群的波动已被频繁报道(AlShawaqfeh 等 2017;Jablonski Wennogle 等 2017;Galler 等 2022;Kaga 等 2024)。AlShawaqfeh 等提出了菌群失调指数(DI),该指数纳入七个关键类群(Faecalibacterium、Turicibacter、Streptococcus、Escherichia coli、Blautia、Fusobacterium 和 Clostridium hiranonis)的定量,以表征 CE 犬的肠道微生物变化。尽管本研究采用 16S rRNA 基因测序而非基于定量 PCR 的 DI 方法,但我们观察到的相对丰度变化与 DI 框架所描述的变化 broadly 一致。在一项相关方法中,Chen 等(2025)按菌群失调指数状态(升高 vs 未升高)对 CE 犬进行分层,并在 DI 升高的犬中识别出独特的微生物基因和代谢物特征。他们的方法依赖于源自七个细菌类群的预设 DI 阈值,而本研究采用无监督 PAM 聚类以数据驱动的方式识别亚型,无需先验假设。尽管两种方法在方法学上不同,但均支持 CE 犬可被分层为具有生物学意义的微生物组亚组这一概念。本研究使用的无监督聚类可通过捕捉超出 DI 面板所含特定类群的更广泛群落结构模式,对 DI 框架形成补充。Phocaeicola 是一种革兰阴性厌氧菌,约占健康犬肠道微生物群的 11%(Kitahara 等 2005;Hand 等 2013),在两个 CE 聚类中相对丰度均降低,其中聚类 2 的降低更为明显。尽管其在犬肠道中的功能作用尚未完全阐明,但其减少可能反映正常核心微生物群结构的更广泛破坏。
聚类 2 的一个尤为突出的特征是 Streptococcus 相对丰度显著升高。已有报道称急性腹泻和 CE 犬中 Streptococcus 丰度增加(Suchodolski 等 2012;Galler 等 2022;Bai 等 2023),其粪便绝对丰度是纳入 DI 用于评估 CE 微生物失调的标准之一(AlShawaqfeh 等 2017)。LEfSe 分析证实,Streptococcus 是本研究中聚类 2 最强的判别类群。同样,Clostridium_T 在聚类 2 中显著富集;Clostridium 属成员,包括 Clostridium difficile,是公认的与犬细菌性腹泻相关的病原体(Marks 和 Kather 2003)。这些潜在致病性或机会性类群的共同富集提示聚类 2 动物的肠道微生物环境进一步恶化。
相反,与短链脂肪酸(SCFA)产生相关的类群在聚类 2 中显著耗竭。多个 Blautia 类群在两个 CE 聚类中相对丰度均降低,其中聚类 2 的降低最为明显。Blautia 与丁酸合成和结肠黏液维持密切相关(Holmberg 等 2024),其减少已在急性腹泻和 CE 犬中被记录(Galler 等 2022;Bai 等 2023)。同样,Ruminococcus_B 在聚类 2 中显著减少;Ruminococcaceae 科成员通过抗性淀粉发酵参与乙酸和丁酸的产生(Onodera 等 2025)。Fusobacteria 丰度在聚类 2 中也较低,该菌通常在犬活动性 IBD 期间下降并在缓解期恢复(Onodera 等 2025)。Faecalibacterium 是一种关键的丁酸产生菌,与 Bifidobacterium 发生交叉喂养相互作用以增强 SCFA 合成(Sokol 等 2008;Suchodolski 等 2012;Onodera 等 2025),其丰度同样减少。与这些微生物学发现一致,靶向 SCFA 分析显示,与聚类 1 相比,聚类 2 中丙酸浓度显著较低。然而,尽管聚类 2 中已知的丁酸和乙酸产生菌如 Fusobacterium、Blautia 和 Faecalibacterium 耗竭,乙酸和丁酸浓度在聚类间并无显著差异。这一差异可能反映肠道微生物群落内的功能冗余,即其他类群部分补偿了特定 SCFA 产生菌的损失。此外,SCFA 浓度不仅受产生菌丰度影响,还受底物可利用性、交叉喂养相互作用和肠道传输时间影响,而这些在本研究中未加以控制。尽管如此,丙酸的选择性减少提示丙酸产生途径可能对聚类 2 中观察到的特定失调模式更为脆弱。SCFA,尤其是丙酸和丁酸,对维持肠上皮屏障完整性和调节局部免疫反应至关重要(Minamoto 等 2019),即使选择性减少也可能对肠道稳态产生功能性后果。
参与胆汁酸和有机酸代谢的类群也显示出显著变化。与HC组相比,Alloprevotella和Anaerobiospirillum_A在两个CE聚类中均减少,且在聚类2中进一步降低。据报道,Alloprevotella在犬CE疾病期会下降,这种减少可能与琥珀酸代谢受损有关,因为琥珀酸已被提出作为肠道疾病的潜在生物标志物(Kaga et al. 2024)。已知某些Anaerobiospirillum物种是琥珀酸产生菌(Nghiem et al. 1997),其耗竭可能进一步扰乱有机酸稳态。
除SCFAs外,非靶向代谢组学显示,与聚类1相比,聚类2中犬尿喹啉酸水平升高,提示犬尿氨酸通路活性增强。犬体内色氨酸分解代谢主要通过犬尿氨酸通路进行,该通路至少占色氨酸降解的90%(Yu et al. 2024)。其余部分通过吲哚和血清素通路代谢,这两条通路均与肠道微生物群活性密切相关(Chajadine et al. 2024)。吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶1(IDO-1)表达增加已在IBD中被记录,并与循环色氨酸浓度降低相关(Kathrani et al. 2019; Churchhouse et al. 2024)。因此,聚类2中犬尿氨酸通路通量增强可能减少吲哚通路可用的色氨酸,从而减少具有抗炎特性的吲哚衍生物的产生,并进一步损害肠道稳态。尽管本研究未测量色氨酸及其直接代谢物,但聚类2中观察到的犬尿喹啉酸水平升高提供了间接证据,表明在菌群失调更严重的聚类中存在色氨酸分解代谢失调。鉴于在小鼠结肠炎模型中已显示肠道炎症和菌群失调可上调IDO-1表达并激活犬尿氨酸通路(Zhao et al. 2023),聚类2中犬尿喹啉酸升高可能反映该亚组中菌群失调和肠道炎症的整体严重程度更高,而非任何单一类群的作用。
本研究存在若干局限性,在解释研究结果时应予以考虑。首先,样本量相对较小,尤其是AD组(n = 8)和治疗分析亚组(聚类1:n = 12;聚类2:n = 18),限制了研究结果的统计效力和普适性;这也可能解释聚类-严重程度关联的序数逻辑回归分析中结果不显著。尽管如此,聚类间缓解率和CCECAI变化的显著差异支持所识别亚型的生物学相关性。其次,横断面观察性研究设计无法推断微生物组组成与疾病结局之间的因果关系,且各病例的治疗方案未标准化;需要采用受控干预的前瞻性研究来确定基于微生物组的分层是否可指导治疗决策。此外,41.1%的CE犬在转诊和基线粪便采样前已接受初级保健兽医给予的类固醇/免疫抑制剂或抗生素,且最后一次给药时间的详细记录并不一致可得。尽管既往用药可能促成了CE队列的整体菌群失调特征,但聚类间预先用药犬的比例无差异(聚类1:45.5% vs 聚类2:38.2%;p = 0.781),提示观察到的聚类水平差异并非归因于用药暴露差异。未来的前瞻性研究最好应纳入未治疗患者或在微生物组采样前强制执行标准化洗脱期。第三,微生物组分析中使用相对丰度而非绝对丰度可能引入组成性偏倚(Gloor et al. 2017; Sung et al. 2023),且品种、饮食以及既往抗生素或益生菌使用等潜在混杂因素未得到系统控制。HC组包括年龄≤3月龄的幼犬(n = 29),这可能影响微生物群组成,因为据报道年轻犬的微生物群组成不同,Faecalibacterium和Blautia较低而Streptococcus较高(Blake et al. 2020; Asaduzzaman et al. 2026)。然而,排除所有幼犬的敏感性分析(保留n = 97只成年犬)证实所有关键发现,包括α和β多样性差异及聚类定义类群,仍然稳健(补充图S2)。
此外,本研究的主要结论基于CE队列内比较,不依赖于HC组的组成。我们的发现与犬CE中已确立的菌群失调模式一致,且微生物组与代谢组数据之间的一致性提供了汇聚性证据,支持所观察到的聚类差异的稳健性。
总之,本研究表明,健康犬、急性腹泻犬和慢性肠病(CE)犬的粪便微生物组谱存在显著差异。在CE队列中,PAM聚类识别出两种不同的基于微生物组的亚型,其在α多样性和β多样性、群落组成、粪便代谢组谱和临床结局方面存在差异。聚类2以潜在致病性分类群富集和短链脂肪酸(SCFA)产生菌耗竭为特征,与基线时处于活动期的犬疾病严重程度更高及治疗后缓解率显著更低相关(38.9% vs 90.0%;p = 0.0159)。然而,鉴于本研究的观察性性质,基于微生物组的聚类分配对治疗结局是否具有真正的预测价值尚需在前瞻性研究中予以证实。这些发现凸显了基于微生物组的患者分层在犬CE中的潜在临床价值,并为未来研究针对不同CE生物型的靶向治疗策略提供了基础。
补充材料
[内容请查看原文]
[内容请查看原文]
[内容请查看原文]
[内容请查看原文]
[内容请查看原文]
[内容请查看原文]
[内容请查看原文]
查看英文原文▾
Abstract
Canine chronic enteropathy (CE) is a heterogeneous disorder with variable clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify fecal microbiome and metabolomic signatures associated with CE severity and treatment outcomes. Fecal samples from dogs with CE (n = 56), acute diarrhea (n = 8), and healthy controls (n = 126) were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and GC-MS-based untargeted metabolomics. CE dogs exhibited significantly reduced microbial diversity compared with the other groups, and unsupervised Partitioning Around Medoids clustering identified two microbiome clusters within the CE cohort. Cluster 2 was characterized by dysbiosis, with enrichment of Streptococcus, Enterococcus, and Klebsiella, and depletion of short-chain fatty acid producers, including Fusobacterium and Blautia. Among dogs with baseline Canine Chronic Enteropathy Clinical Activity Index (CCECAI) > 3, 10 of 12 Cluster 1 dogs (83.3%) achieved remission (CCECAI ≤ 3) after treatment, compared with 7 of 18 Cluster 2 dogs (38.9%; p = 0.0256). CCECAI scores decreased significantly after treatment in Cluster 1 (p = 0.0005) but not in Cluster 2 (p = 0.077). Fecal propanoic acid and kynurenic acid levels also differed between clusters. These findings suggest that gut microbiota and associated metabolites may contribute to differences in CE severity and treatment outcomes.
Introduction
Canine chronic enteropathy (CE) is a gastrointestinal disorder characterized by persistent or recurrent digestive symptoms lasting more than three weeks, with primary clinical signs including diarrhea, vomiting, and anorexia (Allenspach and Mochel 2022). CE is conventionally classified by response to stepwise therapeutic interventions into food-responsive enteropathy (FRE), microbiota-responsive enteropathy (MRE), immunosuppressant-responsive enteropathy (IRE), and non-responsive enteropathy (NRE) (Dandrieux and Mansfield 2019; Rodrigues et al. 2025). However, these therapeutic-response categories do not consistently correspond to disease severity, histopathological findings, or underlying etiology (Dandrieux 2016; Jergens and Heilmann 2022), and classification can only be determined retrospectively after sequential treatment trials. This limitation highlights the need for complementary stratification approaches that can characterize disease phenotypes at the time of diagnosis.
The gut microbiota constitutes a dynamic gastrointestinal ecosystem that plays a critical role in host immune development, metabolic homeostasis, and numerous physiological processes (Pilla and Suchodolski, 2020; Gacesa et al. 2022; Shoubridge et al. 2022). Its effects are mediated through immune stimulation, modulation of intestinal architecture, competitive exclusion of pathogens, and production of key metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) (Guard et al. 2015). Understanding the complex interactions among the host, gut microbiota, and their metabolic end products provides important insights into the pathophysiology of gastrointestinal disorders. Analogous to human inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (Franzosa et al. 2019; Andoh and Nishida 2022), canine enteropathies are characterized by marked dysbiosis, including reduced microbial diversity, structural alterations in community composition, and shifts in core taxa, accompanied by changes in fecal metabolomic profiles (Dandrieux 2016; Fritsch et al. 2022; Kaga et al. 2024; Chen et al. 2025).
Building on these observations, non-invasive diagnostic approaches leveraging gut microbiome signatures have been proposed as promising tools for IBD detection in humans (Zheng et al. 2024), and several studies have suggested microbiome-based diagnostic criteria applicable to canine CE (AlShawaqfeh et al. 2017; Jergens and Heilmann 2022). However, CE is a multifactorial condition influenced by age, breed, diet, clinical history, and individual variability in disease presentation (Galler et al. 2022; Jergens and Heilmann 2022; Yu et al. 2023). Because non-invasive methods often provide limited prognostic information, identifying microbiome and metabolomic features that reflect disease severity and predict treatment outcomes remains a priority for improving clinical management.
The primary objective of this study was therefore to characterize gut microbiota profiles associated with canine CE, to stratify CE cases into biologically meaningful subgroups based on microbiome composition, and to explore the metabolomic correlates of these subgroups and their potential association with disease severity and treatment outcomes. Dogs with acute diarrhea, presenting to a primary care clinic with acute-onset gastrointestinal signs, were included as a comparator group to distinguish CE-specific chronic dysbiosis from transient microbiome perturbations associated with acute gastrointestinal disease.
Materials and methods
Study population and sampling
Between January 2022 and December 2023, fecal samples from dogs with chronic enteropathy (CE group), acute diarrhea (AD group), and clinically healthy controls (HC group) were analyzed in this study. The samples were originally collected as part of independent research projects conducted by Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology (TUAT) and Morinaga Milk Industry Co., Ltd., respectively.
56 client-owned dogs presenting with clinical signs of chronic gastrointestinal disease were recruited from the Japan Animal Referral Medical Center (JARMEC). Dogs were diagnosed with chronic enteropathy (CE group) by attending veterinarians based on comprehensive assessment of clinical signs, complete blood count, serum biochemistry, abdominal ultrasonography, endoscopic biopsy, and evaluation of housing conditions, dietary and medication history, and previous illnesses. Extra-gastrointestinal causes of chronic gastrointestinal signs, including hypoadrenocorticism, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, chronic pancreatitis, and primary infectious enteropathies, were excluded based on these clinical findings; specific hormonal testing was performed when clinically indicated. Disease severity was graded using the Canine Chronic Enteropathy Clinical Activity Index (CCECAI; Allenspach et al. 2007). The CE study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Animal Experiment and Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology (approval no. 0020008), as well as by the Ethics Committee of Morinaga Milk Industry Co., Ltd. (approval no. 21-001).
Fecal samples from dogs with acute diarrhea (AD group; n = 8) and clinically healthy dogs (HC group; n = 126) were originally collected as part of a research project conducted by Morinaga Milk Industry Co., Ltd. Fecal samples from the AD group were obtained from client-owned dogs diagnosed with acute diarrhea by veterinarians at Oda Animal Hospital. Acute diarrhea was defined as the presence of gastrointestinal signs lasting less than three weeks. Detailed classification of diarrhea type (hemorrhagic vs non-hemorrhagic) was not available from the clinical records. All dogs in the AD group were privately owned, lived in diverse household environments, and were fed various commercial diets. Fecal samples from the HC group were obtained from dogs housed at multiple commercial breeding facilities during routine management procedures. The AD and HC study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Morinaga Milk Industry Co., Ltd. (approval no. 21-004).
For the present study, fecal samples obtained from the TUAT-led CE study and the Morinaga-led AD/HC study were integrated and analyzed together as a secondary analysis to investigate fecal microbiome and metabolomic profiles across the three clinical groups. No additional animal interventions or sample collections were performed specifically for this study. All fecal samples were stored at −80 °C until analysis. Written informed consent was obtained from all dog owners or facility managers prior to sample collection.
Fecal DNA extraction and 16S rRNA sequencing
Fecal DNA was extracted as previously described (Komatsu et al. 2022). Briefly, 500 μL of fecal sample in GuSCN solution was lysed with glass beads (300 mg, 0.1 mm diameter) using a FastPrep-24 5 G homogenizer (MP Biomedicals LLC, Santa Ana, CA, USA) at speed setting 5 for 45 s, with 5 min cooling intervals on ice. After centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 5 min, DNA was extracted from 200 μL of supernatant using the GENE PREP STAR PI-480 instrument (Kurabo Industries Ltd., Osaka, Japan) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The V3–V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was paired-end sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq 1000 platform using the NextSeq 1000/2000 P1 Reagent Kit (600 cycles; Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).
Sequence data were analyzed using QIIME2 version 2022.8 (Bolyen et al. 2019). Demultiplexed reads were processed through filtering, denoising, merging, and chimera removal, and amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were generated using DADA2 (Callahan et al. 2016). Taxonomic assignment was performed against the Greengenes2 database version 2022.10 (McDonald et al. 2024). Alpha diversity indices and Bray–Curtis dissimilarity-based principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) were calculated within QIIME2.
Gut microbiota clustering
Clustering of gut microbiota profiles was performed at the genus level using R version 4.3.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) with the packages philentropy version 0.9.0 (Drost 2018), cluster version 2.1.8.1 (Maechler et al. 2019), and fpc version 2.2-13 (Hennig 2024). Jensen–Shannon distance (JSD) matrices were computed between samples, and Partitioning Around Medoids (PAM) clustering was applied. The optimal number of clusters was determined using the Calinski–Harabasz index.
Fecal sample preparation for untargeted metabolomic analysis
Thirty milligrams of fecal sample were weighed into a 2 mL microtube, and 15 mg of 0.2 mm glass beads and 150 μL of PBS were added. The mixture was homogenized twice at 5,500 rpm for 20 s and centrifuged at 21,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.2 μm cellulose acetate membrane filter (ϕ13 mm; Toyo Roshi Kaisha, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Fifty microliters of filtered supernatant were combined with 250 μL of a ternary solvent system of methanol, chloroform, and water (2.5:1:1; Fujifilm Wako, Osaka, Japan) and 5 μL of 1 mg/mL 2-isopropylmalic acid (Fujifilm Wako) as an internal standard. The mixture was incubated at 1,200 rpm and 37 °C for 30 min, then centrifuged at 16,000 × g at 4 °C for 5 min. From 225 μL of the resulting supernatant, 200 μL of distilled water was added, and after a further centrifugation step at 16,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C, 250 μL of supernatant was collected. Solvent was partially removed using a centrifugal evaporator CVE-2200 (Tokyo Rikakikai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) for 25 min. Concentrates were frozen at −80 °C and subsequently lyophilized for 16 h using a vacuum freeze dryer FDU-1200 (Tokyo Rikakikai Co., Ltd.). Lyophilized samples were reconstituted in 40 μL of 20 mg/mL methoxamine hydrochloride (Fujifilm Wako) in pyridine (Fujifilm Wako) and incubated at 1,200 rpm and 30 °C for 90 min. Subsequently, 20 μL of N-methyl-N-trimethylsilyl-trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was added, and samples were incubated at 1,200 rpm and 37 °C for 45 min to complete derivatization.
Untargeted GC-MS analysis
GC-MS analysis was performed as previously described with minor modifications (Li et al. 2024). One microliter of each derivatized sample was injected into a GC-MS QP2020 NX system (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an AOC-20i autosampler (Shimadzu Corporation). Chromatographic separation was performed on a DB-5 capillary column (1.00 μm film thickness; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The injector temperature was maintained at 280 °C with a constant carrier gas flow of 5 mL/min. Electron ionization was performed at 70 eV, and mass spectra were acquired every 0.2 s over an m/z range of 45–600. The oven temperature program was as follows: initial hold at 100 °C for 4 min, ramp at 10 °C/min to 320 °C, and final hold at 320 °C for 11 min. Metabolite identification was performed using MS-DIAL version 4.90 in combination with the Shimadzu Smart Metabolite Database (OA_TMS_DB5_37min_V3_Scan; Shimadzu Corporation). Retention indices derived from an n-alkane series supported peak alignment and annotation. Data processing parameters were set to an m/z range of 45–600 Da, retention index tolerance of 20, and mass-to-charge tolerance of 0.5 Da, with minimum EI spectral similarity and overall identification score thresholds of 70. Raw peak intensities were normalized to the internal standard signal, and when multiple silylated derivatives were detected for a single metabolite, only the most abundant derivative was retained for analysis.
Fecal SCFA quantification by GC-MS
Fecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs; formate, acetate, propionate, butyrate, and pentanoate) were quantified by GC-MS as previously described with minor modifications (Furuhashi et al. 2018). Briefly, 35 mg of fecal sample was weighed into a 2 mL microtube with 15 mg of 0.2 mm glass beads and 1 mL of 10% isobutanol. The mixture was homogenized twice at 5,500 rpm for 20 s and centrifuged at 21,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. From 675 μL of supernatant, 20 μL of 3-methylpentanoate (internal standard), 125 μL of 20 mM NaOH, and 400 μL of chloroform were added. After vortexing and centrifugation at 21,000 × g for 2 min at 4 °C, 400 μL of the upper phase was transferred to a fresh tube, and 70 μL isobutanol, 100 μL pyridine, and 80 μL DNase/RNase-free distilled water were added. Fifty microliters of isobutyl chloroformate was added with the cap open for 3 min to allow gas to escape, followed by addition of 150 μL hexane. After vortexing and centrifugation at 21,000 × g for 2 min at 4 °C, 80 μL of the upper organic phase was transferred to a GC vial for analysis.
GC-MS measurements were performed by injecting 1 μL of derivatized sample into a GC-MS QP2020 NX system equipped with an HP-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness; Agilent Technologies, Inc.). The injector temperature was set at 250 °C with a carrier gas flow of 5 mL/min. The oven temperature program consisted of an initial hold at 50 °C for 5 min, a ramp at 5 °C/min to 150 °C, a ramp at 40 °C/min to 330 °C, and a final hold at 330 °C for 1 min. Mass spectra were acquired over an m/z range of 30–600 in electron ionization mode at 70 eV. SCFA concentrations were determined from extracted ion chromatogram peak areas normalized to the internal standard.
Statistical analysis
Intergroup comparisons of alpha diversity indices and bacterial relative abundances were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Mann–Whitney U test, with Bonferroni correction applied for multiple comparisons. Beta diversity was assessed by permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) using the R package psych version 2.5.6 (Makowski 2018) and SPSS version 30.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was performed using the R package microeco version 1.15.0 (Liu et al. 2025). For metabolomic analyses, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed in R version 4.5.1. Differential metabolites between groups were identified using thresholds of |log₂ fold change| > 1 and false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05, calculated by the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure. Clinical and demographic characteristics (age, body weight, serum albumin, CRP, and pre-medication status) were compared between clusters using the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Because CE dogs received diverse and individualized treatments between initial and follow-up assessments, treatment response was evaluated solely on the basis of CCECAI change, irrespective of the specific therapeutic regimen employed. Treatment outcome analyses were restricted to dogs with both pre- and post-treatment CCECAI data available and a baseline CCECAI > 3, to exclude individuals already in remission at initial presentation and to enable meaningful assessment of treatment response. Remission was defined as CCECAI ≤ 3 at follow-up; an additional analysis using ≥ 75% CCECAI reduction as an alternative response criterion was also performed. Differences in remission rates between clusters were assessed using Fisher's exact test. Pre- and post-treatment CCECAI scores within each cluster were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Post-treatment CCECAI scores between clusters were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. The association between cluster assignment and baseline CCECAI severity was evaluated using cumulative logit ordinal logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and neuter status. To assess the robustness of the HC group comparisons, a sensitivity analysis was performed excluding puppies aged ≤ 3 months (n = 29) from the HC group. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant throughout.
Results
Clinical characteristics
A total of 56 dogs diagnosed with CE were enrolled, along with 8 dogs diagnosed with acute diarrhea (AD group) and 126 clinically healthy dogs (HC group). Detailed individual characteristics of all groups are provided in Supplementary Tables S1–S3. The most common breeds in the CE group were Shiba Inu (n = 8), mixed breed (n = 7), toy poodle (n = 4), and dachshund (n = 3). Among the 56 CE dogs, 33 were female (29 spayed), 22 were male (14 neutered), and 1 was not recorded; the mean age at initial presentation was 8.20 ± 3.52 years (n = 55, excluding one dog with unrecorded age). Median baseline serum albumin was 2.10 g/dL (IQR: 1.80–2.80), and 18 of 54 dogs with available data (33.3%) had hypoalbuminemia (albumin < 2.0 g/dL). Median baseline CRP was 0.42 mg/dL (IQR: 0.14–1.39). Twenty-three of 56 dogs (41.1%) had received steroids/immunosuppressants or antibiotics from their primary care veterinarians before referral and baseline fecal sampling.
Gut microbiota and fecal metabolomic profiles differed among healthy, acute diarrhea, and chronic enteropathy groups
A total of 3,180,943 sequence reads were obtained from 193 samples (mean ± SD: 16,481 ± 11,572 reads per sample), yielding 1,166 ASV features. Significant differences in both Chao1 and Shannon alpha diversity indices were observed among the three groups, with the HC group showing significantly higher values than both the AD and CE groups (Figure 1A). Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity at the species-level annotation provided by the Greengenes2 revealed clear separation between the HC group and both the AD and CE groups (Figure 1B; PERMANOVA F = 22.658, R2 = 0.193, p = 0.001). At the phylum level, the dominant taxa across all groups were Firmicutes_A, Firmicutes_D, Bacteroidota, Fusobacteriota, Firmicutes_C, Actinobacteriota, and Proteobacteria (Figure 1C). At the genus level, Streptococcus was most abundant in the CE group, whereas Fusobacterium_A, Fusobacterium_B, Faecalibacterium, Peptacetobacter, and Ligilactobacillus were more prevalent in the HC group (Figure 1D).
[图:(A) Comparison of fecal microbiota α -diversity (Chao1 index, upper; Shannon index, lower) among healthy dogs (HC), dogs]

For metabolomic analysis, 44 fecal samples from the CE group and 7 from the AD group were available. A total of 206 metabolites were identified and classified according to Human Metabolome Database superclasses (Figure 2A). PCA did not reveal clear separation between the AD and CE groups (Figure 2B), likely reflecting the heterogeneity within the CE cohort. Nevertheless, volcano plot analysis identified 42 metabolites that differed significantly between the two groups (Figure 2C), prompting further investigation of metabolomic variation within the CE group through microbiome-based subgrouping.
[图:(A) Classification of identified fecal metabolites based on Human Metabolome Database superclasses. (B) PCA plot illustr]

PAM clustering identifies two distinct microbiome subtypes within the chronic enteropathy group
To investigate heterogeneity in gut microbiome composition among CE dogs, PAM clustering was applied at the genus level using Jensen–Shannon distances. Based on the highest Calinski–Harabasz index (Supplementary Figure S1), all CE individuals were assigned to either Cluster 1 (n = 22) or Cluster 2 (n = 34) (Figure 3A). Ordinal logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, and neuter status showed that Cluster 2 dogs tended to have higher baseline CCECAI scores compared with Cluster 1, although this did not reach statistical significance (OR = 1.79, 95% CI: 0.60–5.38, p = 0.298; Figure 3B). Clinical and demographic characteristics, including age, sex, body weight, serum albumin, CRP, and pre-medication status, did not differ significantly between clusters (Table 1). Neither age, sex, nor neuter status was significantly associated with baseline CCECAI severity, suggesting that the observed difference in disease severity between clusters was not confounded by these demographic factors. To assess treatment response while excluding individuals already in remission at initial presentation, analyses were restricted to dogs with baseline CCECAI > 3 and available post-treatment data (Cluster 1: n = 12; Cluster 2: n = 18; Supplementary Table S3). Of these, 10 of 12 Cluster 1 dogs (83.3%) achieved remission (CCECAI ≤ 3) following treatment, compared with 7 of 18 Cluster 2 dogs (38.9%; Fisher's exact test, OR = 7.86, 95% CI: 1.31–47.05, p = 0.0256; Table 2 and Figure 3C). CCECAI scores were significantly reduced following treatment in Cluster 1 (median change: −4.5, IQR: −7.0 to −4.0; Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.0005) but not in Cluster 2 (median change: −3.0, IQR: −5.8 to 0.8; p = 0.077), and post-treatment CCECAI scores were significantly lower in Cluster 1 than in Cluster 2 (median: 1.0 vs 6.0; Mann–Whitney U test, p = 0.0152; Figure 3C). When ≥ 75% CCECAI reduction was used as an alternative response criterion, a consistent trend was observed (Cluster 1: 7/12, 58.3% vs Cluster 2: 6/18, 33.3%), although this did not reach statistical significance (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.264). The median interval between baseline and follow-up CCECAI assessments was 14 days (IQR: 12–15; range: 7–60). Body weight, serum albumin, CRP, and pre-medication status at baseline did not differ significantly between clusters in the treatment analysis subset (Supplementary Table S4), indicating that the observed differences in treatment outcomes were not attributable to baseline clinical or medication imbalances. The distribution of treatment categories (steroids/immunosuppressants, antibiotics, probiotics, and other medications) administered between baseline and follow-up assessments did not differ significantly between clusters in the treatment analysis subset (all p > 0.05; Table 1 and Supplementary Table S4), indicating that the observed differences in treatment outcomes were not attributable to differential treatment regimens.
Table 1.. Clinical and demographic characteristics of CE dogs stratified by microbiome cluster.
| Cluster 1 ( n = 22) | Cluster 2 ( n = 34) | p -value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | Median (IQR) | 6.0 (4.0–10.0) | 9.0 (7.0–11.0) | 0.114 |
| Sex | Female/Male | 10/11 | 23/11 | 0.166 |
| Body weight (kg) | Median (IQR) | 5.50 (3.70–9.70) | 6.45 (4.00–8.60) | 0.763 |
| Serum albumin (g/dL) | Median (IQR) | 2.30 (1.90–3.10) | 2.10 (1.80–2.70) | 0.150 |
| Hypoalbuminemia | Albumin < 2.0 g/dL | 6/21 (28.6%) | 12/33 (36.4%) | 0.768 |
| CRP (mg/dL) | Median (IQR) | 0.52 (0.15–2.16) | 0.41 (0.21–1.22) | 0.690 |
| Baseline CCECAI | Median (IQR) | 4.0 (2.8–7.2) | 6.0 (4.0–12.0) | 0.131 |
| Pre-medication a | Yes | 10/22 (45.5%) | 13/34 (38.2%) | 0.781 |
| Mediation b | S/I | 16/21 (76.2%) | 27/33 (81.8%) | 0.733 |
| AB | 13/21 (61.9%) | 22/33 (66.7%) | 0.775 | |
| PB | 1/21 (4.8%) | 4/33 (12.1%) | 0.638 | |
| other | 10/21 (47.6%) | 15/33 (45.5%) | 1.000 |
Table 2.. Treatment outcomes in dogs with chronic enteropathy and baseline CCECAI > 3, stratified by microbiome cluster.
| Cluster 1 ( n = 12) | Cluster 2 ( n = 18) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CCECAI at initial presentation | Mild (4–5) | 5 | 6 |
| Moderate (6–8) | 4 | 4 | |
| Severe (9–11) | 1 | 1 | |
| Very severe (≥12) | 2 | 7 | |
| Median CCECAI (IQR) | 7.0 (4.0–8.2) | 7.5 (5.0–13.0) | |
| CCECAI at follow-up | Insignificant (0–3) | 10 | 7 |
| Mild (4–5) | 1 | 2 | |
| Moderate (6–8) | 1 | 2 | |
| Severe (9–11) | 0 | 2 | |
| Very severe (≥12) | 0 | 5 | |
| Median CCECAI (IQR) | 1.0 (0.0–3.0) | 6.0 (1.2–12.5) | |
| CCECAI change a median (IQR) | −4.5 (−7.0 to −4.0) | −3.0 (−5.8 to 0.8) | |
| Remission rate b | CCECAI ≤ 3 at follow-up | 10/12 (83.3%) * | 7/18 (38.9%) * |
| Treatment response c | Pre vs post (Wilcoxon) | p = 0.0005 † | p = 0.0773 (ns) |
| Post-treatment CCECAI d | Group comparison (Mann–Whitney) | p = 0.0152 ‡ |
[图:(A) Biplot of PAM clustering results based on fecal microbiota profiles at initial presentation, showing Cluster 1 ( n =]

Alpha diversity was significantly lower in both Cluster 1 and Cluster 2 compared with the HC group, with Cluster 2 showing the lowest values for both Chao1 and Shannon indices (Figure 3D). Beta diversity analysis confirmed significant differences in microbial community structure among the HC group, Cluster 1, and Cluster 2 (Figure 3E; PERMANOVA F = 26.778, R2 = 0.231, p = 0.001). At the genus level, Cluster 2 was characterized by a markedly higher relative abundance of Streptococcus compared with both the HC group and Cluster 1, and lower relative abundances of Phocaeicola_A_858004, Fusobacterium_A, Blautia_A_141781, Blautia_A_141780, Fusobacterium_B, and Peptacetobacter (Figure 3F). LEfSe analysis identified Streptococcus, Enterococcus_H_360604, Clostridium_T, and Klebsiella as key contributors to the dysbiotic profile of Cluster 2, while Fusobacterium_A, Blautia_A_141781, Ruminococcus_B, Faecalimonas, and Enterococcus_E were characteristic of Cluster 1 (Figure 3G).
Fecal metabolomic profiles differed between Cluster 1 and Cluster 2
PCA demonstrated clear separation between Cluster 1 and Cluster 2 in metabolomic space (Figure 4A). Volcano plot analysis identified multiple metabolites that differed significantly between the two clusters (Figure 4B). Among the targeted SCFAs, propanoic acid concentration was significantly lower in Cluster 2 compared with Cluster 1, whereas formic, acetic, and butyric acid concentrations did not differ significantly between clusters (Figure 4C).
[图:(A) PCA plot illustrating variance in the fecal metabolome between Cluster 1 and Cluster 2. (B) Volcano plot showing met]

Discussion
This study demonstrated that dogs with CE and those with acute diarrhea exhibit distinct fecal microbiome profiles compared with healthy controls, characterized by reduced microbial diversity and altered community composition. Unsupervised PAM clustering of CE cases based on fecal microbiota profiles identified two biologically meaningful subgroups that differed in disease severity, treatment response, and fecal metabolomic profiles. Key taxa contributing to these differences included Streptococcus, Enterococcus_H_360604, Clostridium_T, Phocaeicola_A_858004, Fusobacterium_A, and Blautia_A_141781. Although no clear metabolomic separation was observed between the AD and CE groups at the group level, this likely reflects the substantial within-group heterogeneity of the CE cohort, as microbiome-based subgrouping subsequently revealed more pronounced metabolomic distinctions between the two CE clusters than between the AD and CE groups as a whole. These findings suggest that gut microbiota structure and associated metabolite profiles collectively contribute to variations in disease severity in canine CE.
Fecal microbiota analysis confirmed significant differences in community structure among healthy dogs, dogs with acute diarrhea, and those with CE, corroborating previous reports of distinct microbial profiles and reduced diversity in dogs with gastrointestinal disorders (AlShawaqfeh et al. 2017; Allenspach and Mochel 2022; Chen et al. 2025). Within the CE cohort, this pattern extended to the cluster level, with Cluster 2 showing lower alpha diversity than Cluster 1. At the phylum level, the core gut microbiota of healthy dogs was dominated by Firmicutes, Fusobacteriota, Bacteroidota, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteriota, consistent with previous pyrosequencing-based reports (Hand et al. 2013). Firmicutes remained the most abundant phylum across all groups and encompasses taxa with well-established roles in SCFA production, including Faecalibacterium and Blautia, both of which have been reported to decline in dogs with CE (Pilla and Suchodolski 2020). Bacteroidota contributes primarily to polysaccharide degradation and acetate production (Mukhopadhya and Louis 2025), and its relative abundance has been reported to decrease during active intestinal inflammation (Shin et al. 2023; Ishikawa et al. 2024; Li et al. 2025). Actinobacteriota, which predominantly colonizes the small intestine, typically increases under conditions of elevated luminal oxygen, such as during acute diarrhea (Chung The and Le 2022). Notably, despite prolonged dysbiosis, the CE group exhibited a lower relative abundance of Actinobacteriota compared with the AD group, which may reflect an adaptive shift in the intestinal microenvironment over the chronic disease course. The CE group also showed the highest proportion of unassigned taxa, potentially indicating progressive erosion of the normal core microbiota.
In dogs with CE, fluctuations in specific bacterial taxa have been frequently documented (AlShawaqfeh et al. 2017; Jablonski Wennogle et al. 2017; Galler et al. 2022; Kaga et al. 2024). AlShawaqfeh et al. proposed the Dysbiosis Index (DI), which incorporates quantification of seven key taxa (Faecalibacterium, Turicibacter, Streptococcus, Escherichia coli, Blautia, Fusobacterium, and Clostridium hiranonis) to characterize gut microbial changes in CE dogs. Although our study employed 16S rRNA gene sequencing rather than the quantitative PCR-based DI method, the shifts in relative abundance we observed were broadly consistent with those described by the DI framework. In a related approach, Chen et al. (2025) stratified CE dogs by dysbiosis index status (elevated vs non-elevated) and identified distinct microbial gene and metabolite signatures in dogs with an elevated DI. Their approach relies on a predefined DI threshold derived from seven bacterial taxa, whereas the present study employed unsupervised PAM clustering to identify subtypes in a data-driven manner without a priori assumptions. Although the two approaches differ methodologically, both support the concept that CE dogs can be stratified into biologically meaningful microbiome-based subgroups. The unsupervised clustering used in the present study may complement the DI framework by capturing broader patterns of community structure beyond the specific taxa included in the DI panel. Phocaeicola, a Gram-negative anaerobic bacterium that constitutes approximately 11% of the gut microbiota in healthy dogs (Kitahara et al. 2005; Hand et al. 2013), showed reduced relative abundance in both CE clusters, with a more pronounced reduction in Cluster 2. Although its functional role in the canine gut remains incompletely characterized, its decline may reflect broader disruption of the normal core microbiota structure.
A particularly prominent feature of Cluster 2 was the markedly elevated relative abundance of Streptococcus. Increased Streptococcus abundance has been reported in dogs with both acute diarrhea and CE (Suchodolski et al. 2012; Galler et al. 2022; Bai et al. 2023), and its absolute fecal abundance is one of the criteria incorporated into the DI for assessing microbial dysbiosis in CE (AlShawaqfeh et al. 2017). LEfSe analysis confirmed that Streptococcus was the strongest discriminative taxon for Cluster 2 in the present study. Similarly, Clostridium_T was significantly enriched in Cluster 2; members of the Clostridium genus, including Clostridium difficile, are recognized pathogens associated with bacterial diarrhea in dogs (Marks and Kather 2003). The co-enrichment of these potentially pathogenic or opportunistic taxa suggests a further deterioration of the gut microbial environment in Cluster 2 animals.
Conversely, taxa associated with SCFA production were markedly depleted in Cluster 2. Multiple Blautia taxa showed reduced relative abundance in both CE clusters, with the most pronounced reduction in Cluster 2. Blautia is closely associated with butyrate synthesis and colonic mucus maintenance (Holmberg et al. 2024), and its decline has been documented in dogs with acute diarrhea and CE (Galler et al. 2022; Bai et al. 2023). Similarly, Ruminococcus_B was significantly reduced in Cluster 2; members of the Ruminococcaceae family contribute to acetate and butyrate production through resistant starch fermentation (Onodera et al. 2025). Fusobacteria abundance, which typically declines during active IBD in dogs and recovers during remission (Onodera et al. 2025), was also lower in Cluster 2. Faecalibacterium, a key butyrate producer that engages in cross-feeding interactions with Bifidobacterium to enhance SCFA synthesis (Sokol et al. 2008; Suchodolski et al. 2012; Onodera et al. 2025), was similarly reduced. Consistent with these microbiological findings, targeted SCFA analysis revealed that propanoic acid concentrations were significantly lower in Cluster 2 compared with Cluster 1. However, acetic and butyric acid concentrations did not differ significantly between clusters, despite the depletion of known butyrate and acetate producers such as Fusobacterium, Blautia, and Faecalibacterium in Cluster 2. This discrepancy may reflect functional redundancy within the gut microbial community, whereby other taxa partially compensate for the loss of specific SCFA producers. Additionally, SCFA concentrations are influenced not only by producer abundance but also by substrate availability, cross-feeding interactions, and intestinal transit time, which were not controlled in this study. The selective reduction in propanoic acid nonetheless suggests that propionate-producing pathways may be more vulnerable to the specific pattern of dysbiosis observed in Cluster 2. SCFAs, particularly propionate and butyrate, are essential for maintaining intestinal epithelial barrier integrity and modulating local immune responses (Minamoto et al. 2019), and even selective reductions may have functional consequences for intestinal homeostasis.
Taxa involved in bile acid and organic acid metabolism also showed notable alterations. Alloprevotella and Anaerobiospirillum_A were reduced in both CE clusters relative to the HC group, with further reductions in Cluster 2. Alloprevotella has been reported to decline during the disease phase of CE in dogs, and this reduction may be associated with impaired succinate metabolism, as succinate has been proposed as a potential biomarker of intestinal disease (Kaga et al. 2024). Certain Anaerobiospirillum species are known succinate producers (Nghiem et al. 1997), and their depletion may further perturb organic acid homeostasis.
Beyond SCFAs, untargeted metabolomics revealed elevated kynurenic acid levels in Cluster 2 relative to Cluster 1, suggesting enhanced kynurenine pathway activity. Tryptophan catabolism in dogs occurs predominantly via the kynurenine pathway, which accounts for at least 90% of tryptophan degradation (Yu et al. 2024). The remaining fraction is metabolized through the indole and serotonin pathways, both of which are closely linked to gut microbiota activity (Chajadine et al. 2024). Increased expression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO-1) has been documented in IBD and is associated with reduced circulating tryptophan concentrations (Kathrani et al. 2019; Churchhouse et al. 2024). Enhanced kynurenine pathway flux in Cluster 2 may therefore reduce tryptophan availability for the indole pathway, thereby diminishing the production of indole derivatives with anti-inflammatory properties and further compromising intestinal homeostasis. Although tryptophan and its direct metabolites were not measured in the present study, the elevated kynurenic acid levels observed in Cluster 2 provide indirect evidence of dysregulated tryptophan catabolism in the more severely dysbiotic cluster. Given that intestinal inflammation and dysbiosis have been shown to upregulate IDO-1 expression and activate the kynurenine pathway in murine colitis models (Zhao et al. 2023), the elevated kynurenic acid in Cluster 2 may reflect the greater overall severity of dysbiosis and intestinal inflammation in this subgroup rather than the effect of any single taxon.
This study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings. First, the relatively small sample sizes, particularly in the AD group (n = 8) and the treatment analysis subsets (Cluster 1: n = 12; Cluster 2: n = 18), limit the statistical power and generalizability of the findings; this may also account for the non-significant result in the ordinal logistic regression analysis of cluster–severity association. Nonetheless, the significant differences in remission rates and CCECAI changes between clusters support the biological relevance of the identified subtypes. Second, the cross-sectional and observational study design precludes causal inference between microbiome composition and disease outcomes, and treatment protocols were not standardized across cases; prospective studies with controlled interventions will be necessary to determine whether microbiome-based stratification can guide therapeutic decision-making. In addition, 41.1% of CE dogs had received steroids/immunosuppressants or antibiotics from their primary care veterinarians before referral and baseline fecal sampling, and detailed records of the timing of last administration were not consistently available. Although prior medication may have contributed to the overall dysbiotic profile of the CE cohort, the proportion of pre-medicated dogs did not differ between clusters (Cluster 1: 45.5% vs Cluster 2: 38.2%; p = 0.781), suggesting that the observed cluster-level differences are not attributable to differential medication exposure. Future prospective studies should ideally enroll treatment-naive patients or enforce standardized washout periods before microbiome sampling. Third, the use of relative rather than absolute abundances in microbiome profiling may introduce compositional bias (Gloor et al. 2017; Sung et al. 2023), and potential confounders such as breed, diet, and prior antibiotic or probiotic use were not systematically controlled. The HC group included puppies aged ≤ 3 months (n = 29), which may have influenced microbiota composition, as young dogs have been reported to harbor compositionally distinct microbiota with lower Faecalibacterium and Blautia and higher Streptococcus (Blake et al. 2020; Asaduzzaman et al. 2026). However, a sensitivity analysis excluding all puppies (retaining n = 97 adult dogs) confirmed that all key findings, including alpha and beta diversity differences and cluster-defining taxa, remained robust (Supplementary Figure S2).
Moreover, the primary conclusions of this study are based on within-CE-cohort comparisons, which are independent of the HC group composition. The consistency of our findings with established dysbiosis patterns in canine CE and the concordance between microbiome and metabolomic data provide converging evidence that supports the robustness of the observed cluster differences.
In conclusion, this study demonstrated that fecal microbiome profiles differ markedly among healthy dogs, those with acute diarrhea, and those with CE. Within the CE cohort, PAM clustering identified two distinct microbiome-based subtypes that differed in alpha and beta diversity, community composition, fecal metabolomic profiles, and clinical outcomes. Cluster 2, characterized by enrichment of potentially pathogenic taxa and depletion of SCFA producers, was associated with greater disease severity and a significantly lower remission rate following treatment among dogs with active disease at baseline (38.9% vs 90.0%; p = 0.0159). However, given the observational nature of this study, whether microbiome-based cluster assignment has true predictive value for treatment outcomes requires confirmation in prospective studies. These findings highlight the potential clinical value of microbiome-based patient stratification in canine CE and provide a foundation for future studies investigating targeted therapeutic strategies for distinct CE biotypes.
Supplementary Material
[内容请查看原文]
[内容请查看原文]
[内容请查看原文]
[内容请查看原文]
[内容请查看原文]
[内容请查看原文]
[内容请查看原文]
兽研