[内容请查看原文]
引言
犬腕关节是一个由多块骨骼、关节及软组织结构的复杂区域[1, 2, 3]。影响这些组成部分的各种疾病均可导致前肢跛行[4],包括骨折[5, 6, 7, 8, 9]、脱位[10, 11, 12, 13, 14]、韧带[15, 16, 17, 18, 19]及肌腱[20, 21, 22, 23]疾病、肿瘤[24, 25, 26, 27, 28]、炎性关节病及退行性关节病(DJD)[11, 29, 30]。创伤性过度伸展常由跳跃或坠落引起,经常导致涉及桡腕关节和腕掌关节的多韧带损伤[31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36]。腕关节疾病通常通过临床和影像学检查进行诊断,包括应力位投照和关节穿刺术[4, 37, 38]。
X线摄影仍是评估骨骼完整性的首选影像学方法,但其缺乏检测软组织异常、关节积液及早期病理变化所需的敏感性[39]。CT[40, 41]、正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)[42, 43]及MRI[25, 41, 44, 45, 46]等先进技术可在选定病例中进行更详细的评估。前臂腕关节的关节镜检查也有报道,但其应用受限于侵入性和特定适应证[47]。相比之下,超声广泛可及、无创、动态且无需全身麻醉。它允许实时评估并与对侧肢体进行比较[22, 48]。
根据欧洲肌肉骨骼放射学会(ESSR)的建议,在人类医学中超声是评估腕部肌腱、神经及软组织的首选影像学方法,因为其他影像技术很少提供额外的诊断价值[49]。在犬中,超声可用于观察正常腕关节解剖结构[50, 51, 52, 53]及伸肌腱的种内解剖变异[54],还可诊断特定病变,如拇长展肌狭窄性腱鞘炎[55]或尺侧腕屈肌腱病[21, 22]。迄今为止,尚无全面的超声研究探讨犬腕关节疾病谱及常伴随的非特异性软组织肿胀[4, 12, 13, 32, 35, 55, 56, 57]。
本研究的目的有三:(1)描述经复合参考标准及临床随访确认的犬腕关节疾病的超声表现;(2)分析与软组织肿胀相关的模式;(3)评估超声相对于X线摄影及在可获得时横断面成像的临床诊断作用。
[内容请查看原文]
材料与方法
[内容请查看原文]
研究对象的选择与描述
2018年至2022年间,在德国慕尼黑路德维希-马克西米利安大学小动物外科与繁殖诊所开展了一项疑似腕关节疾病犬的前瞻性单中心病例系列研究。
每位动物主人作为治疗协议的一部分提供了参与研究的书面同意。所有检查均根据临床适应证和标准方案进行。未为研究目的进行额外操作。本研究遵守欧洲(指令2010/63/EU)和德国(TierSchG、TierSchVersV)动物福利法规。由于未发生法律或伦理违规,无需伦理与动物实验委员会批准。
纳入标准为所有犬必须接受一般、神经学及骨科检查,且仅显示腕关节疾病的证据。为确保病理准确定位于腕关节,通过全面的骨科和神经学检查(包括活动范围测试、关节积液/肿胀/疼痛触诊,以及在需要时对同侧肘部、掌部区域及指部的影像学评估)排除肩部、肘部或远端肢体结构(如掌部或指部)的并发疾病。所有临床检查均由欧洲兽医外科医师学院(ECVS)认证专科医师完成。至少两个正交投照位的X线摄影及患侧腕关节的肌肉骨骼超声检查为强制要求。腕关节疾病的最终诊断作为最终病例分类的复合参考标准,通过整合关节穿刺结果、微生物学/细胞学/组织病理学分析、CT或MRI结果、术中发现及至少1年随访期的临床病程来确定。
以下各节描述临床评估、影像学、诊断确认及结果评估的程序。
[内容请查看原文]
数据收集与分析
收集信号特征、临床、X线摄影、超声及横断面成像(CT和MRI)检查的数据并进行描述性分析。收集额外诊断数据,包括关节穿刺结果、微生物学/细胞学/组织病理学分析结果、术中发现、治疗记录及长期临床随访(>1年)。
[内容请查看原文]
临床评估
记录的临床体征包括跛行、软组织肿胀、关节痛、触诊疼痛及关节积液。关节痛定义为在无明显肿胀或可触及积液的情况下,腕关节被动或主动运动时引发的疼痛。
体格检查时,若腕部凹陷处可触及波动性膨隆,即认为存在关节积液。
[内容请查看原文]
放射学检查
放射照片使用直接数字化X射线摄影系统(Siemens Axiom Luminos dRF;Siemens Healthcare GmbH,Erlangen,Germany)获取。所有犬均对患侧前肢远端拍摄标准内侧位和背掌位视图。当临床检查怀疑腕关节不稳定时(例如,创伤性过伸后和/或疑似撕脱伤病例),和/或标准放射照片对腕关节对线结果不明确时,加拍应力位放射照片。
放射照片使用预定义的结构化评估表进行评估,如支持信息S2所述。每例均记录放射学诊断。为标准化记录,将腕关节分为八个解剖区域,范围从前臂远端三分之一至掌骨近端三分之一。检查结果主观评估,并使用预定义的4分制分级(0=正常;1=轻度;2=中度;3=重度)。
[内容请查看原文]
超声检查
超声检查由两名经验丰富的研究者(S.K.和A.B.)使用GE LOGIQ E9系统(GE Healthcare,Solingen,Germany)进行。使用高频线阵“曲棍球棒”探头(L8–L18i-D,15–18 MHz),不使用垫块。根据临床需求,犬在清醒、镇静或全身麻醉下接受检查。患者取侧卧位,患侧腕关节朝上。
腕关节剃毛、清洁、用酒精脱脂,并涂布耦合剂。超声评估遵循逐步、解剖驱动的入路:(1)沿肌腱、肌肉和韧带的纵向走行检查软组织;(2)评估骨性结构,包括骨表面、关节间隙和滑膜隐窝。纵向和横向扫描平面均平行或垂直于纤维方向或目标结构。图像方向标准化(探头表面位于顶部;头侧/内侧位于左侧;尾侧/外侧位于右侧),并针对每个结构优化超声设置(增益、深度和焦点)。每个腕关节均在中立位、伸展位、屈曲位和动态位置下检查。对于单侧病变的犬,由于主人限制或患者配合有限,未常规扫描对侧肢体。
为标准化记录,将每个腕关节分为16个解剖区域,范围从前臂远端三分之一至掌骨近端三分之一,并涵盖头侧/背侧、内侧、外侧和尾侧/掌侧。超声检查结果使用预定义的结构化评估表记录,如支持信息S3和S4所述。这些表格涵盖软组织、肌肉肌腱、韧带、骨表面、关节、滑膜和肿块相关异常。检查结果主观分级,使用预定义的4分严重程度量表(0=正常;1=轻度;2=中度;3=重度)。由于目前犬腕关节尚无经过验证的定量标准,因此未应用侧别间百分比差异或固定定量阈值,如宽度或横截面积。每例均记录超声诊断。
[内容请查看原文]
特定腕关节疾病的最终确认、治疗和临床病程
每个腕关节的最终诊断通过综合参考标准确立,该标准基于临床、影像学和诊断结果的整合,包括关节穿刺液分析、细胞学、微生物学和病理组织学分析结果,以及CT、MRI、手术所见和至少1年的临床随访。在11个腕关节中,由于主人最初拒绝,未进行进一步组织诊断或横断面成像。尽管如此,这些病例仍被纳入,因为其临床表现、放射学和超声检查结果、治疗反应以及1年随访结果被认为足够一致,足以在综合参考标准内支持最终病例分类。
当临床检查结合放射学和超声检查无法充分定位或表征病变以指导病例管理时,进行高级成像。CT和MRI之间的选择基于整合临床发现和鉴别诊断后的初步诊断(例如,疑似隐匿性或复杂性骨损伤 vs. 疑似主要为软组织受累)。所有扫描均在全身麻醉下进行,犬取头高俯卧位。感兴趣区域从前臂远端三分之一延伸至掌骨中三分之一。
CT检查使用64层螺旋CT扫描仪(SOMATOM Definition AS,CT070/13/S;Siemens Healthcare GmbH,埃尔朗根,德国)进行。采集参数包括140 mAs、120 kV、512×512图像矩阵、重建层厚0.6 mm、重建间隔0.6 mm、旋转时间0.5 s,以及重建核B30s和B70s。使用定位像确定感兴趣区域。静脉对比增强使用非离子型、单体、三碘、水溶性对比剂(iohexol;Accupaque 300;GE Healthcare Buchler GmbH & Co. KG,布伦瑞克,德国),剂量为2 mL/kg体重,经头静脉通过全自动对比剂注射器(MEDRAD Stellant;Bayer Vital GmbH,Bayer Healthcare Radiology,勒沃库森,德国)给药。根据体重和导管尺寸,在注射对比剂前后分别给予5–20 mL 0.9% NaCl团注以冲洗导管系统。注射流速范围为1.5至3.5 mL/s。
MRI检查使用1.5-T MRI系统(MAGNETOM Symphony;Siemens,埃尔朗根,德国)在相同感兴趣区域进行。成像序列包括T2加权涡轮自旋回波(T2W)、静脉对比剂给药前后的T1加权自旋回波(T1W),以及T2加权短tau反转恢复序列(STIR)。对比增强使用钆特酸(Dotavision;b.e. imaging GmbH,巴登-巴登,德国),以0.3 mL/kg体重静脉团注手动给药,随后用0.9% NaCl冲洗。
所有DICOM数据集均使用Horos开源医学影像软件(版本3.3.6;www.horosproject.org;2022 Horos Project)查看和分析。
治疗策略被记录但未标准化,反映了本研究的观察性性质。临床结局在1年时根据随访检查和主人反馈进行评估,并分为四类:无跛行/无症状
残余跛行但有改善
持续性跛行/有症状且无改善
因腕骨疾病进展或其他原因实施安乐死
[内容请查看原文]
统计学
所有数据均在Microsoft Excel(Microsoft 365 Excel,2024;Microsoft Corporation,雷德蒙德,华盛顿州,美国)中记录和整理。统计分析在与州认证资深医学统计学家协商下使用R统计软件环境(版本4.3;R Foundation for Statistical Computing,维也纳,奥地利)进行。
为便于概览和比较,每个腕骨根据最终确诊诊断被归类为四个互斥诊断类别之一。骨病变类别包括主要诊断为骨性疾病的病例,不论是否存在任何并发关节反应。由于DJD常与其他主要诊断共存,并可能伴有不同程度的关节炎症或积液,因此将其记录为并发退行性发现(例如关节周围骨赘形成和软骨下骨重塑/硬化),而非单独的 primary 类别。炎性关节病(化脓性或非化脓性)
骨病变
肿瘤
肌肉肌腱疾病
计算了描述性统计量,包括均值和标准差。由于观察性研究设计和样本量有限,未使用推断性统计。
[内容请查看原文]
结果
以下各节总结了关键发现。超声检查和X线摄影各影像学发现的详细结果见支持信息S1–S8。百分比基于腕骨水平结果的总队列(n = 48)、人口学和结局数据的犬数量(n = 41),以及各模态特定亚组所述的分母。
[内容请查看原文]
研究群体
共有41只犬,均归类为伴侣动物,48个患病腕骨符合所有纳入标准。41只犬中有7只(17%)为双侧患病,41只中有20只(49%)为左侧单侧病变,41只中有14只(34%)为右侧单侧病变。超声检查时的平均年龄为7.1 ± 3.2岁(范围:1–12.3),平均体重为27.4 ± 11.8 kg(范围:5.1–50.1)。
研究群体包括41只中的14只(34%)未去势雄性、41只中的14只(34%)去势雄性、41只中的6只(15%)未绝育雌性和41只中的7只(17%)绝育雌性。
最常见的品种为杂交犬(n = 12/41;29%)、金毛寻回犬(n = 3/41,7%)和拉布拉多寻回犬(n = 3/41,7%)。由于品种代表性有限,未进行品种间的统计分析。
[内容请查看原文]
临床症状、治疗和结局
最常报告的临床症状为跛行和软组织肿胀的组合(n = 19/48;40%)、单纯跛行(n = 17/48;35%)和单纯肿胀(n = 9/48;19%)。关节痛较少见(n = 3/48;6%)。在大多数病例中(n = 40/48;83%),就诊时未发现临床症状的潜在创伤性、感染性、退行性或肿瘤性病因。
骨科检查显示48个腕骨中有37个(77%)存在软组织肿胀,48个中有34个(71%)存在跛行,48个中有32个(67%)存在触诊疼痛。48个腕骨中有7个(15%)可触及关节积液。
大多数腕关节(n = 34/48;70%)采用保守治疗,包括NSAID治疗、制动和/或腱周注射曲安奈德。在1年随访时,48个腕关节中有22个(46%)无症状,18个(38%)显示临床改善。41只犬中有3只(7%)在一年内被安乐死:一只犬因诊断为腕关节肿瘤,两只犬因非腕关节相关疾病——中毒和膀胱尿路上皮癌。
治疗方案和长期结局总结于表1和表2。
TABLE 1. Treatment information per category.
| Treatment | Inflammatory arthropathy ( n = 6) | Bone lesion ( n = 6) | Neoplasia ( n = 6) | Musculotendinous disorder ( n = 30). |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No treatment | 0 (0%) | 2 (33%) | 1 (17%) | 0 (0%) |
| NSAID, movement restriction, supporting and immobilizing bandage | 6 (100%) | 1 (17%) | 1 (17%) | 21 (70%) |
| Peritendinous injection of triamcinolone acetonide | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (17%) |
| Surgical treatment | 0 (0%) | 3 (50%) | 1 (17%) | 4 (13%) |
| Radiotherapy | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (33%) | 0 (0%) |
| Radiotherapy and surgical treatment | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (17%) | 0 (0%) |
TABLE 2. The results of the clinical course for at least 1 year per category.
| Result (clinical course) | Inflammatory arthropathy n = 6 | Bone lesion n = 6 | Neoplasia n = 6 | Musculotendinous disorder n = 30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No lameness, symptom‐free | 2 (33%) | 1 (17%) | 1 (17%) | 18 (60%) |
| Residual lameness, improvement | 4 (67%) | 1 (17%) | 2 (33%) | 11 (37%) |
| Lameness; no improvement | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (33%) | 1 (3.3%) |
| Euthanasia | 0 (0%) | 4 (67%) | 1 (17%) | 0 (0%) |
[内容请查看原文]
诊断类别和最终诊断的确认
所有48个腕关节根据最终确诊诊断被分类为四个诊断类别之一:肌腱肌肉疾病(n = 30/48;63%)、炎性关节病(n = 6/48;13%)、骨病变(n = 6/48;13%)和肿瘤(n = 6/48;13%)(图1)。
[图:按类别划分的腕部疾病病因学。]

48个腕关节中有28个(58%)在犬清醒状态下进行了超声检查,20个(42%)在全身麻醉下进行了超声检查。48个腕关节中有27个(56%)位于左侧,21个(44%)位于右侧。
48个腕关节中有37个(77%)的最终病例分类由一个或多个额外诊断方法支持,最常见的是细胞学(n = 21/48;43%)、微生物学(n = 10/48;21%)、组织病理学(n = 7/48;15%)、手术探查(n = 9/48;19%)、CT(n = 17/48;35%)和MRI(n = 3/48;6%)。48个病例中有1个(2%)同时接受了CT和MRI检查。炎性关节病(n = 6/48;13%)通过关节穿刺术、细胞学、微生物学、组织病理学或其组合得到确认。
在其余48个腕关节中的11个(23%)中,均属于肌腱肌肉类别,最终分类基于综合临床和影像学发现、治疗反应以及预定义复合参考标准内的1年随访。每个最终诊断所需的方法组合描述于表3。
TABLE 3. Summary of final diagnoses, methods of confirmation, affected side, and diagnostic category.
| Nr. | Cat. | Side | Final Diagnosis | ME | S | C/HE | CT | MRI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | L | Chronic fibrosing granulating tendovaginitis and dystrophic calcifying tendinitis of the EDC | X | X | H | X | |
| 2 | 4 | L | Strain of the FCU, sprain of the AMLIV+V | |||||
| 3 | 1 | L | IMPA | X | C | |||
| 4 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | X | ||||
| 5 | 3 | R | Hidrocystoma | X | X | H | ||
| 6 | 4 | R | Sterile purulent tenosynovitis of the ECR, DJD | X | X | H | X | |
| 7 | 4 | R | Sterile fibrinous tenosynovitis of the DDFM | C | ||||
| 8 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | C | X | |||
| 9 | 1 | R | Pericarpal edema, hemarthrosis | X | C | |||
| 10 | 4 | R | Musculotendinopathy of the FCU | |||||
| 11 | 2 | R | Fracture McV, DJD, enthesopathy AMLV, sec. joint effusion | X | C | X | ||
| 12 | 4 | L | Enthesopathy of the ECR and AMLV | X | X | |||
| 13 | 4 | R | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | C | X | |||
| 14 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle, metaplasia MCL | X | ||||
| 15 | 4 | R | Tendovaginitis of the SDFM, IMPA | C | X | |||
| 16 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle, DJD | |||||
| 17 | 4 | R | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle, DJD | |||||
| 18 | 4 | R | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | |||||
| 19 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | |||||
| 20 | 4 | R | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | |||||
| 21 | 3 | R | Sarcoma | X | C | |||
| 22 | 1 | L | Nonerosive immune‐mediated arthritis, SLE | C | ||||
| 23 | 1 | R | Nonerosive immune‐mediated arthritis, SLE | C | ||||
| 24 | 1 | R | Suppurative arthritis, stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | X | C | |||
| 25 | 4 | L | Musculotendinopathy of the FCU, enthesopathy of the AMLIV+V | |||||
| 26 | 4 | L | Musculotendinopathy of the ECR, DJD | X | ||||
| 27 | 2 | L | Complex fracture | X | X | |||
| 28 | 2 | R | Complex fracture | X | X | |||
| 29 | 4 | L | Unspecific joint effusion, edema, desmopathy of the AMLIV+V | X | ||||
| 30 | 2 | L | HO, urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder | C | X | |||
| 31 | 2 | R | HO, urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder | C | X | |||
| 32 | 4 | L | Musculotendinopathy of the FCU, desmopathy of the AMLV | X | X | |||
| 33 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | |||||
| 34 | 4 | R | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | |||||
| 35 | 1 | L | IMPA, DJD | C | ||||
| 36 | 4 | R | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | C | ||||
| 37 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | C | ||||
| 38 | 4 | R | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | C | ||||
| 39 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | |||||
| 40 | 2 | L | Exogenous bacterial osteomyelitis | X | H | X | ||
| 41 | 3 | R | Sarcoma | C | X | |||
| 42 | 3 | L | Sarcoma | C | X | |||
| 43 | 3 | L | Fibrolipoma | C | X | |||
| 44 | 4 | L | Fibrosing tenosynovitis of the SDFM | H | ||||
| 45 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle, hygroma | X | H | |||
| 46 | 4 | L | Sprain of the AMLIV+V | X | X | |||
| 47 | 3 | L | Infiltrating lipoma | H | ||||
| 48 | 4 | R | Fibrosing tenosynovitis of the FCU | C | ||||
| Total number: | 10 | 9 | 28 | 17 | 3 |
[内容请查看原文]
炎性关节病类别(n = 6/48;13%)
48例中有4例(8%)为免疫介导性,而48例中有2例(4%)为非免疫性:1例创伤性关节积血和1例细菌性关节炎,并发偶然性拇长外展肌腱狭窄性腱鞘炎。
影像学上,所有腕关节均显示弥漫性软组织肿胀。48例中有4例(8%)存在轻度退行性关节病征象。诊断分类为非特异性软组织疾病(n = 4/48;8%)、狭窄性腱鞘炎(n = 1/48;2%)或无异常(n = 1/48;2%)。
超声检查上,48例中全部6个(13%)关节均显示前臂腕关节、中腕关节和腕掌关节内均匀无回声积液,伴前臂腕关节脂肪垫向背侧移位(图2)。4个腕关节(8%)显示额外的皮下增厚和轻度退行性改变。1例还同时诊断为狭窄性腱鞘炎。在纵切面上,关节积液形成均匀无回声带,位于前臂腕关节脂肪垫深部,与光滑的关节囊线平行(图2)。除积液相关的关节囊膨胀外,未发现明显的关节囊增厚或滑膜增生性改变。
[图:前臂腕关节积液解剖参考与超声表现。(A)腕背掌位X线片]

未进行横断面成像。
[内容请查看原文]
骨病变类别(n = 6/48;13%)
该组包括48例中3个(6%)腕关节骨折、48例中2个(4%)腕关节继发于膀胱尿路上皮癌的肥厚性骨病,以及48例中1个(2%)腕关节细菌性骨髓炎。
X线摄影和超声检查在48例中2个(4%)腕关节中检出骨折;然而,这些骨折的范围和复杂性无法完全评估。48例中1个(2%)腕关节,两种检查方式均未检出骨折,超声仅显示继发性皮质表面不规则及邻近软组织异常。所有骨折病例均显示腕掌关节无回声积液;两例复杂性骨折还累及前臂腕关节和中腕关节。超声检查上,骨折表现为高回声皮质骨表面的局限性中断。无法准确评估骨折线和骨折块位置。所有病例均注意到邻近软组织异常,包括血肿或水肿。
两例肥大性骨病和该例骨髓炎均可在X线片和超声上识别,表现为骨膜粗糙、皮质增厚及邻近软组织改变(图3)。在纵切面上,皮质表面异常表现为高回声皮质线的不规则或台阶状改变,骨膜增生沿骨表面形成不均匀的高回声层状结构。
[图:肥大性骨病解剖参考与超声表现。(A、B)腕背掌位(A)与内外侧位(]

该类别中所有腕关节均进行了CT检查(n = 6/48;13%),而未进行MRI检查。CT诊断了所有骨折(n = 3/48;6%),并明确了骨折构型、骨折块关系及关节受累情况。在肥大性骨病中(n = 2/48;4%),CT表征了骨膜新生骨形成的分布和表面形态,包括光滑至层状的骨膜套袖样增厚伴皮质完整性保留。在骨髓炎中(n = 1/48;2%),CT显示了皮质溶解、髓腔受累及整体骨性范围。与超声相比,CT可识别区域软组织肿胀,但无法分辨软组织分室(皮下、腱周、关节内)或液体特征,而这些可在超声上显示。
[内容请查看原文]
肿瘤类别(n = 6/48;13%)
该组包括48例中的3例(6%)肉瘤,以及48例中各1例(2%)的汗腺囊瘤、浸润性脂肪瘤(图4)和纤维脂肪瘤。
[图:经组织病理学确诊的掌部浸润性脂肪瘤解剖参考与超声表现。]

在X线片上,最常受累的区域为近端尾侧(区域6;n = 5/48;10%)和远端掌侧(区域8;n = 4/48;8%)。诊断包括软组织肿块性病变(n = 3/48;6%)、非特异性软组织改变(n = 2/48;4%)以及1例(2%)无明显异常病例。48例腕关节中1例(2%)存在轻度退行性关节病。
超声上,所有肿块均表现为不均匀回声纹理和混合回声,无后方声影,边界不清至中度清晰。除汗腺囊瘤外,所有病变均显示血供增加(图5)。半数病例(n = 3/48;6%)伴有皮下增厚伴不均匀回声。最常受累的超声区域为掌内侧和掌外侧(区域14和16;各n = 5/48;10%)。所有病例均无法可靠确定起源的组织分室。所有肿瘤在超声上均被正确识别为肿块性病变,且无并发肌腱肌肉异常。
[图:掌侧腕部肉瘤解剖参考与超声表现。(A)腕部内外侧位X线片]

48例腕关节中3例(6%)进行了CT检查,而未进行MRI检查。CT提供了关于病变大小、内部结构、基于衰减和强化的内部组成以及骨受累的额外信息。肉瘤表现为不均匀强化的软组织肿块,而脂肪瘤性肿瘤显示脂肪衰减成分伴不同程度的软组织部分。没有仅通过CT才检测到的肿块性病变。
[内容请查看原文]
肌腱肌肉疾病类别(n = 30/48;63%)
该类别包括48例腕关节中的30例(63%),具有各种肌腱肌肉病变。部分病例中多个结构同时受累(表3)。在有对侧影像可用时,仅作为定性比较参照;未使用数值阈值。
[内容请查看原文]
X线表现
在所有腕关节中,48例中28例(58%)观察到软组织肿胀,其中48例中22例(46%)归类为弥漫性。X线诊断包括拇长展肌狭窄性腱鞘炎(n = 16;33%)、非特异性软组织疾病(n = 12;25%)、肿块性病变(n = 1;2%)以及1例(2%)无明显异常的关节。48例腕关节中4例(8%)存在轻度退行性关节病。
[内容请查看原文]
超声表现
总体而言,肌腱肌肉病变的主要超声特征包括受累解剖结构的不均匀体积增大和低回声(n = 13/48;27%)或混合回声(n = 17/48;35%)。48例腕关节中15例(31%)存在皮下组织增厚伴不均匀回声。无法可靠区分间质水肿与皮下纤维化。在纵切面上,受累肌腱和韧带显示增厚并丧失正常平行纤维状模式;存在腱鞘扩张时,沿纵向延伸为无回声或低回声柱状结构。
根据超声表现,48例腕关节中27例(56%)确立了具体的肌腱肌肉诊断。48例腕关节中另有4例(8%)显示前臂腕关节轻度均匀无回声积液,伴轻度退行性关节病征象。48例腕关节中3例(6%)归类为肿块性病变,其中两例显示受累结构血供增加。
在一部分肌腱疾病中进行了横断面成像,包括48个腕关节中8个(17%)的CT和48个腕关节中3个(6%)的MRI。在该亚组中,CT描绘了矿化或骨化成分、附着点骨赘、插入部位的骨膜新骨以及皮质重塑或不规则,包括APLM相关的骨骼改变,如突出内侧桡沟的皮质重塑和第一掌骨基部的附着点骨赘。MRI勾勒了腱鞘炎的范围。精细的软组织分隔和非矿化异常,包括鞘增厚或扩张、腱周或皮下积液以及腱内纤维紊乱,在CT上未能分辨,仍为超声检查所见。未记录到仅由CT或仅由MRI作出的原发性肌腱诊断。
最常受累的结构在以下小节中详细描述。增厚使用预定义的4点定性量表记录;未应用左右侧百分比或固定定量截断值。
[内容请查看原文]
拇长展肌改变(APLM,n = 16/48;33%)
APLM是本研究中 most 常受累的解剖结构,48个腕关节中16个(33%)诊断为狭窄性腱鞘炎。41只犬中4只(10%)双侧受累,41只犬中8只(20%)单侧受累,无侧别偏好。
影像学上,主要发现是近内侧区域软组织体积弥漫性增加,见于48个腕关节中12个(25%)。48个腕关节中9个(19%)存在骨骼改变,包括桡沟内或周围局灶性或广泛性骨赘形成。部分病例中,不规则管状增生延伸至茎突以外。另外48个腕关节中9个(19%)可见内侧沟加深伴不透X线边缘。48个腕关节中2个(4%)显示第一掌骨基部附着点病变,伴有近内侧骨膜反应。
超声上,区域1和5是最常改变的区域,并一致显示软组织体积增加。所有APLM病变均表现为不均匀回声纹理和低回声至混合回声。48个腕关节中15个(31%)显示腱鞘增厚,轮廓不规则且回声可变。48个病例中7个(16%)注意到腱鞘内无回声积液。48个腕关节中6个(13%)显示伴声影的高回声灶(图6),符合矿化,而其他则含有无声影的低回声包涵体。48个腕关节中10个(21%)存在附着点病变。在APLM插入处的纵切面上,附着点病变表现为高回声皮质线的不规则和小阶梯状改变,伴局灶性高回声赘生物;矿化灶产生干净的后方声影,腱插入处显示局灶性增厚,边界清晰的纤维状终止消失。
[图:拇长展肌腱狭窄性腱鞘炎解剖参考与超声表现。(A]

腱鞘旁局灶性无回声积液较少见(n = 4/48;8%)。
[内容请查看原文]
第四副掌韧带(AMLIV,n = 7/48;15%)和第五副掌韧带改变(AMLV,n = 4/48;8%)
副掌韧带病变是肌腱组中第二常受累的结构,涉及48个腕关节中7个(15%)的AMLIV和48个腕关节中4个(8%)的AMLV。由于其解剖邻近且常共同受累,两者一并描述。
影像学上,在与AMLIV和AMLV解剖走行相对应的区域,特别是掌侧远端和外侧区(例如区域12和16),检测到软组织肿胀。一个腕关节显示AMLV断裂伴AMLIV并发韧带病。其余病例中,识别出伴或不伴附着点病变的韧带病,通常与韧带插入附近的骨膜不规则相关。
超声上,韧带表现增厚,伴不均匀体积增加和低回声至混合回声(图7)。注意到插入处不规则,五个腕关节显示附着点病变。
[图:创伤相关副掌韧带腱膜病解剖参考与超声表现。]

[内容请查看原文]
尺侧腕屈肌改变(FCUM,n = 5/48;10%)
48个腕关节中5个(10%)诊断为肌腱病。
[内容请查看原文]
影像学发现
在与FCUM解剖位置相对应的区域检测到软组织肿胀,最常见于区域2(近外侧)和区域5(颅近侧)。48个腕关节中2个(4%)显示轻度附着点病变,表现为插入部位的骨膜反应。
[内容请查看原文]
超声发现
病变局限于区域13和14,对应于FCUM插入处。所有五个均表现为肌腱增厚,伴不均匀回声纹理和低回声至混合回声。在矢状面和横切面上可进行头特异性区分,并且在矢状面上评估最为一致:两个腕关节的肱头和尺头均受累,两个仅肱头受累,一个腕关节仅尺头受累(图8)。
[图:尺侧腕屈肌严重肌腱病解剖参考与超声表现。(A)]

[内容请查看原文]
其他结构
较少受累的解剖结构包括指总伸肌(n = 1/48;2%)、桡侧腕伸肌(n = 3/48;6%)、指浅屈肌(n = 2/48;4%)、指深屈肌(n = 2/48;4%)以及内侧副韧带(n = 1/48;2%)。
放射学与超声表现因受累解剖结构而异,但均与肌腱或韧带病变相符(支持信息S2–S4)。
[内容请查看原文]
软组织体积变化
通过放射学或超声检查,48个腕关节中有46个(96%)发现软组织肿胀。放射学评估仅能对正常与软组织体积增加进行二元区分,无法进一步表征皮下或更深层结构。相比之下,超声能够详细区分皮下增厚、肌腱异常与关节积液。其分布模式因诊断类别而异,并与受累解剖结构及其潜在病理相对应(支持信息S5–S8)。48个腕关节中有27个(56%)存在回声不均匀的皮下增厚,且最常与肌腱病变相关。
超声上,皮下增厚呈现两种反复出现的形态学表现:(i) 网状“蜂窝状”模式,特征为细小高回声间隔环绕小低回声小叶;(ii) 更为均匀的弥漫性回声增高,伴正常分叶状皮下脂肪结构部分或完全消失。两种表现均无后方声影,彩色或能量多普勒血流缺失或极少。
两种形态学表现均有观察到,且在若干病例中两种模式的特征相互重叠,导致超声上无法明确区分。因此,结果部分未进行病因学归类(例如间质性水肿与皮下纤维化)。
这些皮下改变在所有诊断类别中均有观察到,因此进行了合并分析。
[内容请查看原文]
讨论
本研究是首个涵盖犬腕关节疾病谱的综合性超声病例系列,最终病例分类基于复合参考标准与临床随访。通过系统表征广泛病理(包括肌腱疾病、炎性关节病、肿瘤及骨病变)的超声特征,为临床使用提供了参考数据。既往研究集中于正常超声解剖[50, 51, 52, 54]、实验性关节积液[53]或孤立病变如拇长展肌狭窄性腱鞘炎[55]和尺侧腕屈肌腱病[21, 22];然而,尚未发表过涵盖已确认犬腕关节疾病谱的结构化超声病例系列。
超声为腕关节肿胀的评估提供了分腔室和结构特异性信息。放射学可记录肿胀但无法定位[39],而超声可将异常定位至皮下、肌腱、关节周围或关节腔内腔室,从而缩小鉴别诊断范围。炎性关节病更常表现为弥漫性肿胀,而其他诊断类别通常局限于主要受累结构[4, 12, 13, 32, 35, 55, 56, 57]。
皮下改变是常见的并发发现,最常表现为网状“蜂窝状”模式和/或弥漫性回声增高,且常在同一区域内重叠。鉴于腕关节区域皮下组织厚度极薄且超声表现重叠,仅凭超声表现无法可靠区分水肿、纤维化与蜂窝织炎。因此,结果部分未进行病因学归类。然而,在临床解读中,这些非特异性皮下改变被认为最符合水肿,除非通过额外诊断检测确认感染,此时将所见归类为蜂窝织炎。彩色多普勒充血表现不一致,可能反映技术局限性及/或非感染性水肿中通常存在的低血管分布[58, 59]。未来使用超高频换能器[60]、B-flow或超声造影的研究可能改善皮下组织表征[59, 61]。
肌腱疾病是主要类别,其中以拇长展肌狭窄性腱鞘炎最为常见。临床、放射学及超声表现与既往描述一致[23, 55, 62, 63]。与放射学相比,超声提供了更详细的评估,尤其是对腱鞘增厚、纤维不规则及腱周改变[55]。与早期报道提示与敏捷犬或工作犬相关[55]不同,本队列中未能证实这一点。这一差异可能反映区域人群与转诊模式的不同。
第IV和第V副掌韧带的韧带病是另一种常见的腕关节疾病,由于其密切的解剖关系及在过伸损伤复合体中常共同受累,故在此一并讨论[4, 33, 34, 64]。许多疑似过伸损伤的犬在急诊阶段即接受了处理,因此被排除在本队列之外。在纳入的病例中,超声证实了第IV和第V副掌韧带的韧带病和断裂,尽管其全面描述相关骨折的能力有限;据作者所知,本研究首次对犬第IV和第V副掌韧带异常进行了超声描述(图7)。有必要针对过伸损伤复合体开展前瞻性集中研究。
关节积液连同关节穿刺术和滑液分析是关节疾病诊断和分类的核心[65],但触诊可能难以检出,其缺失可能延误关节穿刺[30]。既往关于犬腕关节积液的研究仅限于实验性注射模型[53];据作者所知,本研究首次对临床患者自然发生的腕关节积液进行了超声描述(图2)。一个一致的征象是前臂腕侧脂肪垫的背侧移位;应避免过度施加探头压力,因为其可导致液体重新分布并降低敏感性。在临床模棱两可的病例中,背侧及掌外侧扫查可能有帮助[53]。使用本研究所用的高频探头,超声可评估积液及浅层关节囊和滑膜改变;鉴于纤维关节囊相对于滑膜衬里的密集感觉神经支配,关节囊膨胀/关节囊炎可能导致疼痛,而滑膜炎也可能与疼痛相关[66, 67]。在本研究中,疼痛为临床记录(而非超声检查期间记录),除积液相关的关节囊膨胀外,未发现明显的关节囊增厚或滑膜增生性改变。未来研究应使用超高频探头标准化腕关节积液的记录和分级[60]。
超声检查有助于检出局灶性软组织肿块并进行解剖定位。所有六个病变均被识别为肿块性病变,并经细胞学或组织病理学证实为肿瘤。超声特征包括回声质地不均匀、回声性混合、无声影、边缘界定差至中等,以及常见血供增加;然而,这些特征可与包括肉芽肿性疾病在内的非肿瘤性病变重叠[37]。重要的是,超声检查无法可靠地进行良恶性分类;因此,明确分类需要组织采样。鉴于犬腕关节肿瘤的罕见性[24, 25, 27, 28],未来研究可采用超声造影来阐明血供和浸润模式。
由于观察性设计、病例构成异质及缺乏标准化对照组,无法计算正式的诊断准确性指标(如敏感性和特异性);超声检查和横断面成像仅在临床有指征时进行,且对侧比较并非始终可得。由于缺乏经过验证的犬腕关节定量截断值,研究结果采用预定义的定性0–3分级量表而非固定数值阈值进行分级,对侧评估在可得时以定性方式应用。尽管存在这些局限性,现有数据支持超声检查在犬腕关节疾病评估中具有实质性的实际诊断作用。
综合横断面成像结果表明,横断面成像主要在部分病例中细化了病变范围和骨性细节,尤其是包括骨折在内的骨病变,但并未一致性地改变由X线摄影和超声检查联合建立的初步诊断。
[内容请查看原文]
结论
X线摄影和高频超声检查应联合用作犬腕关节疾病的实用一线影像学方法。超声检查对检出腕关节积液尤为有用,并可在临床评估模棱两可时促进及时进行关节穿刺。CT或MRI应保留用于部分病例,尤其是那些具有复杂、模棱两可或主要为骨性疾病的病例。
作者贡献
构思与设计:Sven Klußmann和Andreas Brühschwein。数据获取:Sven Klußmann、Andreas Brühschwein和Andrea Meyer‐Lindenberg。数据分析和解释:Sven Klußmann、Andreas Brühschwein和Andrea Meyer‐Lindenberg。文章起草:Sven Klußmann。文章智力内容审阅:Sven Klußmann和Andreas Brühschwein。完成文章最终批准:Sven Klußmann、Andrea Meyer‐Lindenberg和Andreas Brühschwein。同意对工作的各个方面负责,确保与工作任何部分的准确性或完整性相关的问题得到适当调查和解决:Sven Klußmann、Andreas Brühschwein和Andrea Meyer‐Lindenberg。
利益冲突
作者声明无利益冲突。
披露
这些结果此前未曾展示或发表。未使用报告清单。
数据可获取性声明
支持本研究结果的数据可向通讯作者S.K.索取。
支持信息
[内容请查看原文]
查看英文原文▾
[内容请查看原文]
Introduction
The canine carpus is a complex region consisting of multiple bones, joints, and soft tissue structures [1, 2, 3]. Various conditions affecting these components can result in forelimb lameness [4], including fractures [5, 6, 7, 8, 9], luxations [10, 11, 12, 13, 14], ligamentous [15, 16, 17, 18, 19] and tendinous [20, 21, 22, 23] disorders, neoplasms [24, 25, 26, 27, 28], inflammatory arthropathies, and degenerative joint disease (DJD) [11, 29, 30]. Traumatic hyperextension, often caused by jumping or falling, frequently results in multiligamentous injuries involving the radiocarpal and carpometacarpal joints [31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36]. Carpal disease is typically diagnosed using clinical and radiographic examinations, including stress views and arthrocentesis [4, 37, 38].
Radiography remains the first‐line imaging modality for assessing bone integrity, but it lacks the sensitivity required to detect soft tissue abnormalities, joint effusion, and early‐stage pathological changes [39]. Advanced techniques such as CT [40, 41], positron emission tomography‐computed tomography (PET‐CT) [42, 43], and MRI [25, 41, 44, 45, 46] allow more detailed evaluation in selected cases. Arthroscopy of the antebrachiocarpal joint has also been described, although its use is limited by invasiveness and specific indications [47]. In contrast, ultrasound is widely accessible, noninvasive, and dynamic, and does not require general anesthesia. It allows real‐time assessment and comparison with the contralateral limb [22, 48].
According to the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR), ultrasound is the first‐line imaging modality for evaluating tendons, nerves, and soft tissues of the wrist in human medicine, as other imaging techniques rarely offer additional diagnostic value [49]. In dogs, ultrasound can be used to visualize normal carpal anatomy [50, 51, 52, 53] and intraspecific anatomical variations of the extensor tendons [54], as well as to diagnose individual pathologies such as stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle [55] or tendinopathy of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle [21, 22]. To date, no comprehensive ultrasonographic study has addressed the spectrum of canine carpal disorders and the frequently associated nonspecific soft tissue swelling [4, 12, 13, 32, 35, 55, 56, 57].
The aims of this study were threefold: (1) to characterize ultrasonographic findings in canine carpal disorders confirmed by a composite reference standard and clinical follow‐up, (2) to analyze associated patterns of soft tissue swelling, and (3) to assess the clinical diagnostic role of ultrasound in relation to radiography and, where available, cross‐sectional imaging.
[内容请查看原文]
Materials and Methods
[内容请查看原文]
Selection and Description of Subjects
A prospective, single‐center case series of dogs with suspected carpal disease was conducted between 2018 and 2022 at the Clinic for Small Animal Surgery and Reproduction, Ludwig‐Maximilians‐University of Munich, Germany.
Each owner provided written consent for participation in the study as part of the treatment agreement. All examinations were performed according to clinical indications and standard protocols. No additional procedures were undertaken for study purposes. The study complied with European (Directive 2010/63/EU) and German (TierSchG, TierSchVersV) animal welfare regulations. As no legal or ethical violations occurred, approval from the Ethics and Animal Experimentation Committee was not required.
To be included, all dogs had to undergo general, neurologic, and orthopedic examinations and show evidence of carpal disease only. To ensure accurate localization of pathology to the carpus, concurrent disorders of the shoulder, elbow, or distal limb structures such as the metacarpus or digits were excluded by comprehensive orthopedic and neurologic examination, including range‐of‐motion testing, palpation for joint effusion, swelling, or pain, and radiographic assessment of the ipsilateral elbow, metacarpal region, and digits when indicated. All clinical examinations were performed by diplomates of the European College of Veterinary Surgeons (ECVS). Radiographs in at least two orthogonal projections and musculoskeletal ultrasonography of the affected carpus were mandatory. A definitive diagnosis of carpal disease, which served as the composite reference standard for final case classification, was established by integrating arthrocentesis results, microbiologic, cytologic, or histopathologic analyses, CT or MRI findings, surgical findings, and the clinical course over a minimum follow‐up period of 1 year.
The following sections describe the procedures for clinical assessment, imaging, diagnostic confirmation, and outcome evaluation.
[内容请查看原文]
Data Collection and Analysis
Data from signalment, clinical, radiographic, ultrasonographic, and cross‐sectional imaging (CT and MRI) examinations were collected and analyzed descriptively. Additional diagnostic data were collected, including the results of arthrocentesis, microbiologic, cytologic, and histopathologic analyses; surgical findings; treatment records; and long‐term clinical follow‐up (>1 year).
[内容请查看原文]
Clinical Assessment
Clinical signs recorded included lameness, soft tissue swelling, arthralgia, pain on palpation, and joint effusion. Arthralgia was defined as pain elicited during passive or active motion of the carpal joint in the absence of visible swelling or palpable effusion.
Joint effusion was considered present when fluctuant distension of the carpal recess was palpable on physical examination.
[内容请查看原文]
Radiographic Examination
Radiographs were obtained using a direct digital radiography system (Siemens Axiom Luminos dRF; Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). Standard mediolateral and dorsopalmar views of the affected distal forelimb were obtained in all dogs. Additional stress radiographs were acquired when carpal instability was suspected on clinical examination (e.g., following traumatic hyperextension and/or in cases of suspected avulsion injury) and/or when standard radiographs were equivocal for carpal alignment.
Radiographs were assessed using a predefined structured assessment form, as outlined in Supporting Information S2. A radiographic diagnosis was recorded for each case. For standardized documentation, the carpus was divided into eight anatomic regions extending from the distal third of the antebrachium to the proximal third of the metacarpus. Findings were evaluated subjectively and graded using a predefined 4‐point scale (0 = normal; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe).
[内容请查看原文]
Ultrasonographic Examination
Ultrasonographic examinations were performed by two experienced investigators (S.K. and A.B.) using a GE LOGIQ E9 system (GE Healthcare, Solingen, Germany). A high‐frequency linear “Hockey Stick” transducer (L8–L18i‐D, 15–18 MHz) was used without a standoff pad. Depending on clinical requirements, dogs were examined awake, sedated, or under general anesthesia. Patients were positioned in lateral recumbency with the affected carpus uppermost.
The carpus was clipped, cleaned, degreased with alcohol, and coated with coupling gel. Ultrasonographic evaluation followed a stepwise, anatomy‐driven approach: (1) soft tissues, including tendons, muscles, and ligaments, were examined along their longitudinal course, and (2) osseous structures, including bone surfaces, joint spaces, and synovial recesses, were assessed. Both longitudinal and transverse scan planes were aligned either parallel or perpendicular to the fiber orientation or target structure. Image orientation was standardized (transducer surface at the top; cranial/medial to the left; caudal/lateral to the right), and ultrasound settings (gain, depth, and focus) were optimized for each structure. Each carpus was examined in neutral, extended, flexed, and dynamic positions. In dogs with unilateral disease, the contralateral limb was not routinely scanned because of owner constraints or limited patient cooperation.
For standardized documentation, each carpus was divided into 16 anatomic regions extending from the distal third of the antebrachium to the proximal third of the metacarpus and encompassing the cranial/dorsal, medial, lateral, and caudal/palmar aspects. Ultrasonographic findings were recorded using predefined structured assessment forms, as outlined in Supporting Information S3 and S4. These forms covered soft‐tissue, musculotendinous, ligamentous, osseous‐surface, articular, synovial, and mass‐associated abnormalities. Findings were graded subjectively using a predefined 4‐point severity scale (0 = normal; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe). Because no validated quantitative criteria currently exist for the canine carpus, no side‐to‐side percentage differences or fixed quantitative thresholds, such as width or cross‐sectional area, were applied. An ultrasonographic diagnosis was recorded for each case.
[内容请查看原文]
Final Confirmation of the Specific Carpal Disorder, Treatment, and Clinical Course
The final diagnosis for each carpus was established using a composite reference standard based on the integration of clinical, imaging, and diagnostic findings, including results of arthrocentesis, cytologic, microbiologic, and histopathologic analyses, as well as CT, MRI, surgical findings, and clinical follow‐up over a minimum period of 1 year. In 11 carpi, further tissue diagnostics or cross‐sectional imaging were not performed because of initial owner refusal. These cases were nonetheless included because the clinical presentation, radiographic and ultrasonographic findings, treatment response, and 1‐year follow‐up findings were considered sufficiently consistent to support final case classification within the composite reference standard.
Advanced imaging was pursued when clinical examination in combination with radiography and ultrasonography did not allow sufficient lesion localization or characterization to guide case management. The choice between CT and MRI was based on the working diagnosis after integration of the clinical findings and differential diagnoses (e.g., suspected occult or complex osseous injury vs. suspected predominantly soft tissue involvement). All scans were performed under general anesthesia with the dog positioned in a head‐up prone position. The region of interest extended from the distal third of the antebrachium to the middle third of the metacarpus.
CT examinations were performed using a 64‐slice helical CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition AS, CT070/13/S; Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). Acquisition parameters included 140 mAs, 120 kV, a 512 × 512 image matrix, a reconstructed slice thickness of 0.6 mm, a reconstruction interval of 0.6 mm, a rotation time of 0.5 s, and reconstruction kernels B30s and B70s. A topogram was used to define the region of interest. Intravenous contrast enhancement was achieved using a nonionic, monomeric, triiodinated, water‐soluble contrast agent (iohexol; Accupaque 300; GE Healthcare Buchler GmbH & Co. KG, Braunschweig, Germany) administered at a dose of 2 mL/kg body weight via the cephalic vein using a fully automated contrast injector (MEDRAD Stellant; Bayer Vital GmbH, Bayer Healthcare Radiology, Leverkusen, Germany). A 5–20 mL bolus of 0.9% NaCl was administered before and after contrast injection to flush the catheter system, depending on body weight and catheter size. Injection flow rates ranged from 1.5 to 3.5 mL/s.
MRI examinations were performed using a 1.5‐T MRI system (MAGNETOM Symphony; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with the same region of interest. Imaging sequences included T2‐weighted turbo spin echo (T2W), T1‐weighted spin echo (T1W) before and after intravenous contrast administration, and T2‐weighted short tau inversion recovery (STIR). Contrast enhancement was achieved with gadoteric acid (Dotavision; b.e. imaging GmbH, Baden‐Baden, Germany) administered manually as a 0.3‐mL/kg body weight IV bolus followed by a 0.9% NaCl flush.
All DICOM datasets were viewed and analyzed using Horos open‐source medical imaging software (version 3.3.6; www.horosproject.org; 2022 Horos Project).
Treatment strategies were documented but were not standardized, reflecting the observational nature of the study. Clinical outcomes were assessed at 1 year on the basis of follow‐up examination and owner feedback and were classified into four categories:
No lameness/symptom‐free
Residual lameness with improvement
Persistent lameness/symptomatic without improvement
Euthanasia due to progression of carpal disease or another reason
[内容请查看原文]
Statistics
All data were recorded and organized in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft 365 Excel, 2024; Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Statistical analyses were performed in consultation with a state‐certified senior medical statistician using the R statistical software environment (version 4.3; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
For overview and comparison, each carpus was classified into one of four mutually exclusive diagnostic categories based on the final confirmed diagnosis. The bone lesion category comprised cases in which the primary diagnosis was an osseous disorder, irrespective of any concurrent articular reaction. Because DJD frequently coexisted with other primary diagnoses and may be accompanied by variable articular inflammation or effusion, it was recorded as a concurrent degenerative finding (e.g., periarticular osteophytosis and subchondral bone remodeling/sclerosis) rather than as a separate primary category.
Inflammatory arthropathy (suppurative or nonsuppurative)
Bone lesion
Neoplasia
Musculotendinous disorder
Descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviations, were calculated. Inferential statistics were not used because of the observational study design and limited sample size.
[内容请查看原文]
Results
The following sections summarize the key findings. Detailed results for individual imaging findings on ultrasonography and radiography are provided in Supporting Information S1–S8. Percentages are based on the total cohort (n = 48) for carpus‐level results, on the number of dogs (n = 41) for demographic and outcome data, and on the stated denominators for modality‐specific subsets.
[内容请查看原文]
Study Population
A total of 41 dogs, all classified as companion animals, with 48 affected carpi met all inclusion criteria. Seven of 41 (17%) dogs were affected bilaterally, 20 of 41 (49%) had a unilateral lesion on the left side, and 14 of 41 (34%) had a unilateral lesion on the right side. The mean age at ultrasonographic examination was 7.1 ± 3.2 years (range: 1–12.3), and the mean body weight was 27.4 ± 11.8 kg (range: 5.1–50.1).
The study population included 14 of 41 (34%) intact males, 14 of 41 (34%) neutered males, 6 of 41 (15%) intact females, and 7 of 41 (17%) spayed females.
The most common breeds were crossbreeds (n = 12/41; 29%), Golden Retrievers (n = 3/41, 7%), and Labrador Retrievers (n = 3/41, 7%). Because of the limited breed representation, statistical analysis between breeds was not performed.
[内容请查看原文]
Clinical Signs, Treatment, and Outcome
The most frequently reported clinical signs were a combination of lameness and soft tissue swelling (n = 19/48; 40%), lameness alone (n = 17/48; 35%), and swelling alone (n = 9/48; 19%). Arthralgia was noted less frequently (n = 3/48; 6 %). In the majority of cases (n = 40/48; 83%), no underlying traumatic, infectious, degenerative, or neoplastic cause of the clinical signs was identified at presentation.
Orthopedic examination revealed soft tissue swelling in 37 of 48 (77%) carpi, lameness in 34 of 48 (71%), and pain on palpation in 32 of 48 (67%). Palpable joint effusion was observed in 7 of 48 (15%) carpi.
Most carpi (n = 34/48; 70%) were managed conservatively, including NSAID therapy, immobilization, and/or peritendinous triamcinolone acetonide injection. At 1‐year follow‐up, 22 of 48 (46%) carpi were asymptomatic, and 18 of 48 (38%) showed clinical improvement. Three of 41 (7%) dogs were euthanized within a year: one dog due to diagnosed neoplasia of the carpus, and two dogs due to non‐carpus‐related diseases—intoxication and urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder.
Treatment protocols and long‐term outcomes are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.
TABLE 1. Treatment information per category.
| Treatment | Inflammatory arthropathy ( n = 6) | Bone lesion ( n = 6) | Neoplasia ( n = 6) | Musculotendinous disorder ( n = 30). |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No treatment | 0 (0%) | 2 (33%) | 1 (17%) | 0 (0%) |
| NSAID, movement restriction, supporting and immobilizing bandage | 6 (100%) | 1 (17%) | 1 (17%) | 21 (70%) |
| Peritendinous injection of triamcinolone acetonide | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (17%) |
| Surgical treatment | 0 (0%) | 3 (50%) | 1 (17%) | 4 (13%) |
| Radiotherapy | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (33%) | 0 (0%) |
| Radiotherapy and surgical treatment | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (17%) | 0 (0%) |
TABLE 2. The results of the clinical course for at least 1 year per category.
| Result (clinical course) | Inflammatory arthropathy n = 6 | Bone lesion n = 6 | Neoplasia n = 6 | Musculotendinous disorder n = 30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No lameness, symptom‐free | 2 (33%) | 1 (17%) | 1 (17%) | 18 (60%) |
| Residual lameness, improvement | 4 (67%) | 1 (17%) | 2 (33%) | 11 (37%) |
| Lameness; no improvement | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (33%) | 1 (3.3%) |
| Euthanasia | 0 (0%) | 4 (67%) | 1 (17%) | 0 (0%) |
[内容请查看原文]
Diagnostic Categories and Confirmation of Final Diagnosis
All 48 carpi were classified into one of four diagnostic categories based on the final confirmed diagnosis: musculotendinous disorders (n = 30/48; 63%), inflammatory arthropathy (n = 6/48; 13%), bone lesions (n = 6/48; 13%), and neoplasia (n = 6/48; 13%) (Figure 1).
[图:Etiology of carpal disease per category.]

US was performed on 28 of 48 (58%) carpi while the dogs were awake and on 20 of 48 (42%) carpi under general anesthesia. Twenty‐seven of 48 (56%) carpi were on the left side, and 21 of 48 (44%) were on the right side.
Final case classification was supported by one or more additional diagnostic methods in 37 of 48 (77%) carpi, most commonly cytology (n = 21/48; 43%), microbiology (n = 10/48; 21%), histopathology (n = 7/48; 15%), surgical exploration (n = 9/48; 19%), CT (n = 17/48; 35%), and MRI (n = 3/48; 6%). One case of 48 (2%) underwent both CT and MRI. Inflammatory arthropathy (n = 6/48; 13%) was confirmed by arthrocentesis, cytology, microbiology, histopathology, or combinations thereof.
In the remaining 11 of 48 (23%) carpi, all within the musculotendinous category, final classification was based on integrated clinical and imaging findings, treatment response, and 1‐year follow‐up within the predefined composite reference standard. The required combinations of methods for each final diagnosis are described in Table 3.
TABLE 3. Summary of final diagnoses, methods of confirmation, affected side, and diagnostic category.
| Nr. | Cat. | Side | Final Diagnosis | ME | S | C/HE | CT | MRI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | L | Chronic fibrosing granulating tendovaginitis and dystrophic calcifying tendinitis of the EDC | X | X | H | X | |
| 2 | 4 | L | Strain of the FCU, sprain of the AMLIV+V | |||||
| 3 | 1 | L | IMPA | X | C | |||
| 4 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | X | ||||
| 5 | 3 | R | Hidrocystoma | X | X | H | ||
| 6 | 4 | R | Sterile purulent tenosynovitis of the ECR, DJD | X | X | H | X | |
| 7 | 4 | R | Sterile fibrinous tenosynovitis of the DDFM | C | ||||
| 8 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | C | X | |||
| 9 | 1 | R | Pericarpal edema, hemarthrosis | X | C | |||
| 10 | 4 | R | Musculotendinopathy of the FCU | |||||
| 11 | 2 | R | Fracture McV, DJD, enthesopathy AMLV, sec. joint effusion | X | C | X | ||
| 12 | 4 | L | Enthesopathy of the ECR and AMLV | X | X | |||
| 13 | 4 | R | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | C | X | |||
| 14 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle, metaplasia MCL | X | ||||
| 15 | 4 | R | Tendovaginitis of the SDFM, IMPA | C | X | |||
| 16 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle, DJD | |||||
| 17 | 4 | R | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle, DJD | |||||
| 18 | 4 | R | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | |||||
| 19 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | |||||
| 20 | 4 | R | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | |||||
| 21 | 3 | R | Sarcoma | X | C | |||
| 22 | 1 | L | Nonerosive immune‐mediated arthritis, SLE | C | ||||
| 23 | 1 | R | Nonerosive immune‐mediated arthritis, SLE | C | ||||
| 24 | 1 | R | Suppurative arthritis, stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | X | C | |||
| 25 | 4 | L | Musculotendinopathy of the FCU, enthesopathy of the AMLIV+V | |||||
| 26 | 4 | L | Musculotendinopathy of the ECR, DJD | X | ||||
| 27 | 2 | L | Complex fracture | X | X | |||
| 28 | 2 | R | Complex fracture | X | X | |||
| 29 | 4 | L | Unspecific joint effusion, edema, desmopathy of the AMLIV+V | X | ||||
| 30 | 2 | L | HO, urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder | C | X | |||
| 31 | 2 | R | HO, urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder | C | X | |||
| 32 | 4 | L | Musculotendinopathy of the FCU, desmopathy of the AMLV | X | X | |||
| 33 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | |||||
| 34 | 4 | R | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | |||||
| 35 | 1 | L | IMPA, DJD | C | ||||
| 36 | 4 | R | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | C | ||||
| 37 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | C | ||||
| 38 | 4 | R | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | C | ||||
| 39 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle | |||||
| 40 | 2 | L | Exogenous bacterial osteomyelitis | X | H | X | ||
| 41 | 3 | R | Sarcoma | C | X | |||
| 42 | 3 | L | Sarcoma | C | X | |||
| 43 | 3 | L | Fibrolipoma | C | X | |||
| 44 | 4 | L | Fibrosing tenosynovitis of the SDFM | H | ||||
| 45 | 4 | L | Stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle, hygroma | X | H | |||
| 46 | 4 | L | Sprain of the AMLIV+V | X | X | |||
| 47 | 3 | L | Infiltrating lipoma | H | ||||
| 48 | 4 | R | Fibrosing tenosynovitis of the FCU | C | ||||
| Total number: | 10 | 9 | 28 | 17 | 3 |
[内容请查看原文]
Inflammatory Arthropathy Category (n = 6/48; 13%)
Four of 48 (8%) cases were immune‐mediated, while 2 of 48 (4%) were nonimmune: one traumatic hemarthrosis and one bacterial arthritis with concurrent incidental stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle.
Radiographically, all carpi showed generalized soft tissue swelling. Mild signs of DJD were present in 4 of 48 (8%) cases. The diagnoses were classified as nonspecific soft tissue disorders (n = 4/48; 8%), stenosing tenosynovitis (n = 1/48; 2%), or unremarkable (n = 1/48; 2%).
Ultrasonographically, all 6 of 48 (13%) joints showed homogeneous anechoic effusion in the antebrachiocarpal, mediocarpal, and carpometacarpal joints, with dorsal displacement of the antebrachiocarpal fat pad (Figure 2). Four carpi (8%) showed additional subcutaneous thickening and mild degenerative changes. One case was also diagnosed with concurrent stenosing tenosynovitis. In the longitudinal plane, joint effusion formed a homogeneous anechoic band deep to the antebrachiocarpal fat pad, paralleling a smooth capsular line (Figure 2). Beyond effusion‐related capsular distension, no overt capsular thickening or synovial proliferative changes were identified.
[图:Anatomic reference and ultrasonographic appearance of antebrachiocarpal joint effusion. (A) Dorsopalmar radiograph of th]

Cross‐sectional imaging was not performed.
[内容请查看原文]
Bone Lesion Category (n = 6/48; 13%)
This group included 3 of 48 (6%) carpi with fractures, 2 of 48 (4%) carpi with hypertrophic osteopathy secondary to urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder, and 1 of 48 (2%) carpi with bacterial osteomyelitis.
Radiography and ultrasonography detected fractures in 2 of 48 (4%) carpi; however, the extent and complexity of these fractures could not be fully assessed. In 1 of 48 (2%) carpi, the fracture was not detected by either modality, and ultrasound showed only secondary cortical surface irregularity with adjacent soft tissue abnormalities. All fracture cases showed anechoic effusion in the carpometacarpal joint; the two complex fractures also involved the antebrachiocarpal and the mediocarpal joints. Ultrasonographically, the fractures appeared as localized disruptions of the hyperechoic cortical bone surface. Accurate assessment of the fracture lines and fragment position was not possible. Adjacent soft tissue abnormalities, including hematoma or edema, were noted in all cases.
Both cases of hypertrophic osteopathy and the case of osteomyelitis were identifiable on radiographs and ultrasound, presenting with periosteal roughening, cortical thickening, and adjacent soft tissue changes (Figure 3). In the longitudinal plane, cortical surface abnormalities were appreciable as irregularities or step‐offs of the echogenic cortical line, and periosteal proliferation formed uneven echogenic lamination along the bone surface.
[图:Anatomic reference and ultrasonographic appearance of hypertrophic osteopathy. (A, B) Dorsopalmar (A) and mediolateral (]

CT was performed in all carpi in this category (n = 6/48; 13%), whereas MRI was not performed. CT diagnosed all fractures (n = 3/48; 6%) and delineated fracture configuration, fragment relationships, and articular involvement. In hypertrophic osteopathy (n = 2/48; 4%), CT characterized the distribution and surface morphology of periosteal new bone formation, including smooth‐to‐lamellated periosteal cuffing with preserved cortical integrity. In osteomyelitis (n = 1/48; 2%), CT showed cortical lysis, medullary involvement, and overall osseous extent. Compared with ultrasonography, CT identified regional soft tissue swelling but did not resolve soft tissue compartmentalization (subcutaneous, peritendinous, intra‐articular) or fluid characteristics, which were demonstrated on ultrasound.
[内容请查看原文]
Neoplasia Category (n = 6/48; 13%)
This group included 3 of 48 (6%) sarcomas and 1 of 48 (2%) each of hidrocystoma, infiltrative lipoma (Figure 4), and fibrolipoma.
[图:Anatomic reference and ultrasonographic appearance of a histopathologically confirmed infiltrative lipoma of the palmar ]

Radiographically, the most commonly affected areas were caudoproximal (area 6; n = 5/48; 10%) and palmarodistal (area 8; n = 4/48; 8%). The diagnoses included soft tissue mass lesions (n = 3/48; 6%), nonspecific soft tissue changes (n = 2/48; 4%), and one (2%) unremarkable case. Mild DJD was present in 1 of 48 (2%) carpi.
On ultrasound, all masses showed heterogeneous echotexture and mixed echogenicity, lacked acoustic shadowing, and were poorly to moderately demarcated. Except for the hidrocystoma, all lesions exhibited increased vascularity (Figure 5). Half of the cases (n = 3/48; 6%) had concurrent subcutaneous thickening with heterogeneous echogenicity. The most frequently altered ultrasonographic regions were palmaromedial and palmarolateral (areas 14 and 16; n = 5/48; 10% each). The tissue compartment of origin could not be determined reliably in all cases. All neoplasms were correctly identified as mass lesions on ultrasound, and no concurrent musculotendinous abnormalities were present.
[图:Anatomic reference and ultrasonographic appearance of a palmar carpal sarcoma. (A) Mediolateral radiograph of the carpus]

CT was performed in 3 of 48 (6%) carpi, whereas MRI was not performed. CT provided additional information on lesion size, internal architecture, attenuation‐ and enhancement‐based internal composition, and osseous involvement. Sarcomas appeared as heterogeneously enhancing soft tissue masses, whereas the lipomatous tumor showed fat‐attenuating components with variable soft tissue portions. No mass lesion was detected exclusively by CT.
[内容请查看原文]
Musculotendinous Disorders Category (n = 30/48; 63%)
This category included 30 of 48 (63%) carpi with various musculotendinous pathologies. In some cases, multiple structures were affected simultaneously (Table 3). Where contralateral images were available, they were used as a qualitative comparator only; no numeric thresholds were used.
[内容请查看原文]
Radiographic Findings
Across all carpi, soft tissue swelling was observed in 28 of 48 (58%) carpi and was classified as diffuse in 22 of 48 (46%) cases. Radiographic diagnoses included stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle (n = 16; 33%), nonspecific soft tissue disorders (n = 12; 25%), mass lesion (n = 1; 2%), and unremarkable joint (n = 1; 2%). Mild DJD was present in 4 of 48 (8%) carpi.
[内容请查看原文]
Ultrasonographic Findings
Overall, the primary ultrasonographic characteristics of musculotendinous lesions included heterogeneous volume increase and hypoechoic (n = 13/48; 27%) or mixed echogenicity (n = 17/48; 35%) of the affected anatomic structure. Subcutaneous tissue thickening with heterogeneous echogenicity was present in 15 of 48 (31%) carpi. Reliable differentiation between interstitial edema and subcutaneous fibrosis was not possible. In the longitudinal plane, affected tendons and ligaments showed thickening and loss of the normal parallel fibrillar pattern; tendon‐sheath distension, when present, extended longitudinally as an anechoic or hypoechoic column.
A specific musculotendinous diagnosis was established in 27 of 48 (56%) carpi based on ultrasound findings. Four of 48 (8%) carpi additionally showed mild homogeneous anechoic effusion in the antebrachiocarpal joint along with mild signs of DJD. Three of 48 (6%) carpi were classified as mass lesions, two of which showed increased vascularity of the affected structure.
Cross‐sectional imaging was obtained in a subset of musculotendinous disorders, including CT in 8 of 48 (17%) carpi and MRI in 3 of 48 (6%) carpi. In this subset, CT delineated mineralized or ossified components, enthesophytes, periosteal new bone at insertion sites, and cortical remodeling or irregularities, including APLM‐associated osseous changes such as cortical remodeling accentuating the medial radial sulcus and enthesophytes at the first metacarpal base. MRI outlined the extent of tenosynovitis. Fine soft tissue compartmentalization and nonmineralized abnormalities, including sheath thickening or distension, peritendinous or subcutaneous fluid, and intratendinous fiber derangement, were not resolved on CT and remained ultrasonographic findings. No CT‐only or MRI‐only primary musculotendinous diagnosis was recorded.
The most frequently affected structures are described in detail in the following subsections. Thickening was recorded using the predefined qualitative 4‐point scale; no side‐to‐side percentages or fixed quantitative cutoffs were applied.
[内容请查看原文]
Abductor Pollicis Longus Muscle Changes (APLM, n = 16/48; 33%)
The APLM was the most frequently affected anatomic structure in this study, with stenosing tenosynovitis diagnosed in 16 of 48 (33%) carpi. Four of 41 (10%) dogs were affected bilaterally, and 8 of 41 (20%) dogs were affected unilaterally, with no side preference.
Radiographically, the predominant finding was a diffuse increase in soft tissue volume in the proximomedial area, observed in 12 of 48 (25%) carpi. Bony changes were present in 9 of 48 (19%) carpi, including focal or extensive osteophyte formation within or around the radial groove. In some cases, irregular, tubular proliferations extended beyond the styloid process. A deepened medial sulcus with radiopaque margins was visible in another 9 of 48 (19%) carpi. Two of 48 (4%) carpi showed enthesopathic changes at the base of the first metacarpal bone, accompanied by periosteal reactions on the proximomedial aspect.
Ultrasonographically, areas 1 and 5 were the most frequently altered regions and consistently showed increased soft tissue volume. All APLM lesions exhibited heterogeneous echotexture and hypoechoic to mixed echogenicity. Fifteen of 48 (31%) carpi showed thickening of the tendon sheath with irregular contour and variable echogenicity. Anechoic fluid within the tendon sheath was noted in 7 of 48 (16%) cases. Six of 48 (13%) carpi showed hyperechoic foci with acoustic shadowing (Figure 6), consistent with mineralization, while others contained nonshadowing hypoechoic inclusions. Enthesopathic changes were present in 10 of 48 (21%) carpi. In the longitudinal plane at the APLM insertion, enthesopathic changes appeared as irregularities and small step‐offs of the echogenic cortical line with focal echogenic excrescences; mineralized foci produced clean posterior acoustic shadowing, and the tendon insertion showed focal thickening with loss of the sharply marginated fibrillar termination.
[图:Anatomic reference and ultrasonographic appearance of stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus tendon. (A]

Focal anechoic fluid accumulations adjacent to the tendon sheath were observed less frequently (n = 4/48; 8%).
[内容请查看原文]
Accessoriometacarpal Ligament IV (AMLIV, n = 7/48; 15%) and Accessoriometacarpal Ligament V Changes (AMLV, n = 4/48; 8%)
Lesions of the accessoriometacarpal ligaments were the second most frequently affected structures within the musculotendinous group, involving AMLIV in 7 of 48 (15%) carpi and AMLV in 4 of 48 (8%) carpi. Because of their anatomic proximity and frequent co‐involvement, both are described together.
Radiographically, soft tissue swelling was detected in areas corresponding to the anatomic course of AMLIV and AMLV, particularly in the palmarodistal and lateral zones (e.g., areas 12 and 16). One carpus showed rupture of AMLV with concurrent desmopathy of AMLIV. In the remaining cases, desmopathy with or without enthesopathy was identified, typically associated with periosteal irregularities near the ligament insertions.
Ultrasonographically, the ligaments appeared thickened, with heterogeneous volume increase and hypoechoic to mixed echogenicity (Figure 7). Insertional irregularities were noted, and five carpi showed enthesopathic changes.
[图:Anatomic reference and ultrasonographic appearance of trauma‐associated desmopathy of the accessoriometacarpal ligaments]

[内容请查看原文]
Flexor Carpi Ulnaris Muscle Changes (FCUM, n = 5/48; 10%)
Musculotendinopathy was diagnosed in 5 of 48 (10%) carpi.
[内容请查看原文]
Radiographic Findings
Soft tissue swelling was detected in areas corresponding to the anatomic location of the FCUM, most commonly in area 2 (proximolateral) and area 5 (cranioproximal). Two of 48 (4%) carpi showed mild enthesopathy, indicated by periosteal reactions at the insertion sites.
[内容请查看原文]
Ultrasonographic Findings
Lesions were localized to areas 13 and 14, corresponding to the FCUM insertion. All five exhibited musculotendinous thickening with heterogeneous echotexture and hypoechoic to mixed echogenicity. Head‐specific differentiation was possible in sagittal and transverse views and was most consistently assessed on sagittal views: both the humeral and ulnar heads were affected in two carpi, only the humeral head in two, and only the ulnar head in one carpus (Figure 8).
[图:Anatomic reference and ultrasonographic appearance of severe musculotendinopathy of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle. (A)]

[内容请查看原文]
Other Structures
Less frequently affected anatomic structures included the extensor digitorum communis muscle (n = 1/48; 2%), extensor carpi radialis muscle (n = 3/48; 6%), superficial digital flexor muscle (n = 2/48; 4%), deep digital flexor muscle (n = 2/48; 4%), and the medial collateral ligament (n = 1/48; 2%).
Radiographic and ultrasonographic findings varied depending on the anatomic structure involved but were consistently compatible with musculotendinous or ligamentous lesions (Supporting Information S2–S4).
[内容请查看原文]
Soft Tissue Volume Changes
Soft tissue swelling was identified in 46 of 48 (96%) carpi by either radiography or ultrasound. Radiographic assessment allowed only a binary distinction between normal and increased soft tissue volume, without further characterization of subcutaneous or deeper structures. In contrast, ultrasound allowed detailed differentiation among subcutaneous thickening, musculotendinous abnormalities, and joint effusion. The distribution pattern varied by diagnostic category and corresponded to the affected anatomic structure and its underlying pathology (Supporting Information S5–S8). Subcutaneous thickening with heterogeneous echogenicity was present in 27 of 48 (56%) carpi and was most commonly associated with musculotendinous lesions.
On ultrasound, subcutaneous thickening exhibited two recurring morphologic appearances: (i) a reticular, “honeycomb‐like” pattern characterized by fine hyperechoic septa surrounding small hypoechoic lobules, and (ii) a more uniform, diffuse increase in echogenicity with partial or complete loss of the normal lobulated subcutaneous fat architecture. Both appearances were nonshadowing and showed absent or minimal color or power Doppler flow.
Both morphologic appearances were observed, and in several cases the features of the two patterns overlapped, precluding clear differentiation between them on ultrasound. Accordingly, no etiologic assignment (e.g., interstitial edema vs. subcutaneous fibrosis) was made in Results section.
These subcutaneous alterations were observed across all diagnostic categories and were therefore analyzed collectively.
[内容请查看原文]
Discussion
This study represents the first comprehensive ultrasonographic case series across the spectrum of canine carpal disorders, with final case classification based on a composite reference standard and clinical follow‐up. By systematically characterizing ultrasonographic features across a broad range of pathologies—including musculotendinous disorders, inflammatory arthropathies, neoplasms, and bone lesions—it provides reference data for clinical use. Previous studies have focused on normal ultrasonographic anatomy [50, 51, 52, 54], experimental joint effusion [53], or isolated entities such as stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus [55] and flexor carpi ulnaris tendinopathy [21, 22]; however, a structured ultrasound case series across the confirmed spectrum of canine carpal disorders has not previously been published.
Ultrasonography provided compartmental and structure‐specific information for the evaluation of carpal swelling. Radiography documents swelling but cannot localize it [39], whereas ultrasound localized abnormalities to subcutaneous, musculotendinous, periarticular, or intra‐articular compartments, thereby narrowing the differential diagnoses. Inflammatory arthropathies more often presented with generalized swelling, whereas the other diagnostic categories typically localized to the primarily affected structure [4, 12, 13, 32, 35, 55, 56, 57].
Subcutaneous changes were frequent concurrent findings and most commonly appeared as a reticular “honeycomb‐like” pattern and/or as a diffuse increase in echogenicity, often overlapping within the same region. Given the minimal thickness of the subcutaneous tissues in the carpal region and the overlap in sonographic appearance, reliable differentiation among edema, fibrosis, and cellulitis was not possible based on ultrasonographic appearance alone. Accordingly, no etiologic assignment was made in the Results section. In clinical interpretation, however, these nonspecific subcutaneous changes were considered most compatible with edema unless infection was confirmed by additional diagnostic testing, in which case the findings were classified as cellulitis. Color Doppler hyperemia was inconsistent, likely reflecting technical limitations and/or the low vascularity typically present in noninfectious edema [58, 59]. Future studies using ultrahigh‐frequency transducers [60], B‐flow, or contrast‐enhanced ultrasound may improve subcutaneous characterization [59, 61].
Musculotendinous disorders were the predominant category, with stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus most frequent. Clinical, radiographic, and ultrasonographic findings were consistent with previous descriptions [23, 55, 62, 63]. Compared with radiography, ultrasound provided more detailed assessment, particularly for tendon‐sheath thickening, fiber irregularity, and peritendinous changes [55]. In contrast to earlier reports suggesting an association with agility or working dogs [55], this could not be confirmed in our cohort. This difference may reflect regional population and referral patterns.
Desmopathy of the accessoriometacarpal ligaments IV and V represented another frequent carpal disorder and is discussed here together because of their close anatomic relationship and frequent co‐involvement in the hyperextension injury complex [4, 33, 34, 64]. Many dogs with suspected hyperextension injury were managed during the emergency phase and were therefore excluded from the present cohort. In the enrolled cases, ultrasound demonstrated desmopathy and rupture of the accessoriometacarpal ligaments IV and V, despite its limited ability to fully characterize associated fractures; to the authors’ knowledge, this study provides the first ultrasonographic description of altered accessoriometacarpal ligaments IV and V in dogs (Figure 7). Focused prospective studies on the hyperextension injury complex are warranted.
Joint effusion, together with arthrocentesis and synovial fluid analysis, is central to the diagnosis and classification of joint disease [65], yet it may be difficult to detect by palpation, and its absence can delay arthrocentesis [30]. Previous work on carpal effusion in dogs was limited to experimental injection models [53]; to the authors’ knowledge, this study provides the first ultrasonographic description of naturally occurring carpal effusion in clinical patients (Figure 2). A consistent sign was dorsal displacement of the antebrachiocarpal fat pad; excessive transducer pressure should be avoided because it can redistribute fluid and reduce sensitivity. In clinically equivocal cases, dorsal as well as palmarolateral scans may be useful [53]. With the high‐frequency transducer used here, ultrasound can assess effusion and superficial capsular and synovial changes; capsular distension/capsulitis may contribute to pain given the dense sensory innervation of the fibrous capsule relative to the synovial lining, while synovitis may also be pain‐associated [66, 67]. In the present study, pain was recorded clinically (not during ultrasonography), and beyond effusion‐related capsular distension, no overt capsular thickening or synovial proliferative changes were identified. Future studies should standardize documentation and grading of carpal effusion using ultrahigh‐frequency transducers [60].
Ultrasonography was useful for detecting and anatomically localizing focal soft‐tissue masses. All six lesions were identified as mass lesions and confirmed as neoplasms cytologically or histopathologically. Sonographic features included heterogeneous echotexture, mixed echogenicity, absence of acoustic shadowing, poor‐to‐moderate margin definition, and commonly increased vascularity; however, these features can overlap with nonneoplastic conditions, including granulomatous disease [37]. Importantly, ultrasonography did not allow reliable benign–malignant classification; therefore, definitive classification requires tissue sampling. Given the rarity of canine carpal tumors [24, 25, 27, 28], contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography may clarify vascularity and infiltration patterns in future studies.
Formal diagnostic accuracy metrics (e.g., sensitivity and specificity) could not be calculated because of the observational design, heterogeneous case mix, and absence of a standardized control group; ultrasonography and cross‐sectional imaging were obtained only when clinically indicated, and contralateral comparison was not consistently available. Because validated quantitative cutoffs for the canine carpus are lacking, findings were graded using a predefined qualitative 0–3 scale rather than fixed numeric thresholds, with contralateral assessment applied qualitatively when available. Despite these limitations, the present data support a substantial practical diagnostic role for ultrasonography in the evaluation of canine carpal disease.
The integrated cross‐sectional imaging findings indicate that cross‐sectional imaging primarily refined lesion extent and osseous detail in selected cases, particularly in bone lesions including fractures, but did not consistently change the primary diagnosis established by combined radiography and ultrasonography.
[内容请查看原文]
Conclusion
Radiography and high‐frequency ultrasonography should be used in combination as a practical first‐line imaging approach for canine carpal disease. Ultrasonography is particularly useful for detecting carpal effusion and may facilitate timely arthrocentesis when clinical assessment is equivocal. CT or MRI should be reserved for selected cases, particularly those with complex, equivocal, or predominantly osseous disease.
Author Contributions
Conception and design: Sven Klußmann and Andreas Brühschwein. Acquisition of data: Sven Klußmann, Andreas Brühschwein, and Andrea Meyer‐Lindenberg. Analysis and interpretation of data: Sven Klußmann, Andreas Brühschwein, and Andrea Meyer‐Lindenberg. Drafting the article: Sven Klußmann. Reviewing the article for intellectual content: Sven Klußmann and Andreas Brühschwein. Final approval of the completed article: Sven Klußmann, Andrea Meyer‐Lindenberg, and Andreas Brühschwein. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved: Sven Klußmann, Andreas Brühschwein, and Andrea Meyer‐Lindenberg.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Disclosure
These results have not been previously presented or published. No reporting checklist was used.
Data Accessibility Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, S.K.
Supporting information
[内容请查看原文]
兽研