引言
新型脑炎性疾病不断被报道——与通道抗体相关¹、与COVID-19(病毒及疫苗)相关² ³、以及与恶性肿瘤新型治疗药物相关⁴,仅举三例——这些内容在神经病学文献和培训课程中占据了大量篇幅。然而,长期以来已知的脑炎性疾病仍持续对全球健康产生重大影响,却往往对执业神经科临床医生来说完全陌生。例如,英国神经科医生中只有极少数人曾遇到过最严重、最剧烈的脑炎之一——狂犬病的病例。近期一名英国公民在约克郡和亨伯地区被诊断后不幸死亡⁵,这强调了我们所有人都有必要对狂犬病的表现有不止于浅尝辄止的了解。
狂犬病之所以引人注目,或许在于三个尤其令人不安的特征:它是极少数能感染所有哺乳动物的病毒之一⁶ ⁷;其病死率几乎为100%⁷⁻¹⁰;虽然其潜伏期通常为21至90天,但约10%的病例潜伏期超过一年⁹——事实上,有充分文献记载的病例在暴露后4至6年才发病¹¹ ¹²,还有一些报告称潜伏期远远超过十年⁷ ¹³⁻¹⁵。
狂犬病脑炎由弹状病毒科、狂犬病病毒属、狂犬病病毒亚组的嗜神经病毒引起(图1)。它通过唾液传播,唾液污染咬伤、抓伤、伤口及任何其他形式的近期黏膜暴露。全球范围内,99%的人类病例继发于犬咬伤。其他致病储存宿主哺乳动物包括狐狸、郊狼、猫、浣熊、臭鼬和蝙蝠⁸。在此,我们报告来自乌干达北部的两例非洲男性病例,他们均作为急诊患者收入同一家医院,均在猫咬伤后发展为迅速致死的脑炎型狂犬病。
[图:狂犬病毒。www.scientificanimations.com/wiki-images/ - http://www.scientificanimations.com/wiki-images/ CC BY-SA 4.0]

病例介绍
病例1
一名十几岁晚期男性,既往无慢性疾病,因意识模糊和烦躁不安就诊于乌干达北部Lacor圣玛丽医院急诊科(图2)。他有严重吞咽痛,且过去48小时内有发热。无声音改变、咳嗽、呼吸困难、意识丧失或惊厥病史,也无酒精或违禁药物使用迹象。其社交史具有重要意义:他主要从事当地灌木丛和森林中的狩猎活动。近日,他在狩猎时遇到两只猫在一个村庄里打架;他上前干预,被猫轻微咬伤,但皮肤被穿透。(从就诊到猫咬伤之间的间隔时间不明确:患者本人意识模糊,不同照护者对该事件发生时间的描述各不相同。)
[图:乌干达北部拉科尔圣玛丽医院。]

检查时,患者意识模糊,伴有严重精神运动性激越发作——在病房里 incoherently 尖叫着乱跑,极度痛苦且明显惊恐。明显的恐水症表现明显。他有自主神经功能障碍的特征,包括流涎和持续血压升高。咽部局部检查正常,除心动过速和高血压外,其他身体系统无明显异常。
全血细胞计数显示轻度白细胞增多伴中性粒细胞增多,血涂片疟原虫阴性。
临床上,印象为患者表现出脑炎型狂犬病的典型特征。患者被隔离并给予支持治疗,包括阿片类镇痛药(肌内注射曲马多)、维持性静脉输液(乳酸林格液)和抗焦虑药——先静脉注射地西泮,后改为肌内注射氯丙嗪。然而,其脑炎症状进行性加重;他迅速陷入昏迷,入院15小时后死亡;未尝试复苏。
病例2
一名二十几岁晚期男性在访问乌干达北部Kitgum区期间被野猫咬伤。伤口在家中进行了表面清洗。他未寻求医疗救治;他从未接受暴露后疫苗接种或狂犬病免疫球蛋白。
约3个月后,他开始前往当地卫生机构就诊,主诉咬伤部位持续瘙痒及沿患肢放射的烧灼感。其妻子报告其行为发生显著变化,性欲明显增强。尽管多次就诊,均未怀疑狂犬病,也没有临床医生建议接种疫苗。
暴露后约6个月,患者因大量出汗、唾液分泌过多、急性尿潴留和严重排尿困难被紧急送至急诊科。最初按疑似尿源性脓毒症进行经验性治疗。然而,入院数小时内,其病情急剧恶化,出现明显的恐水症、攻击行为和激越、迅速加重的意识模糊以及不断升级的自主神经不稳定,血压升至171/102 mmHg,心动过速达130–157次/分。脑炎型狂犬病的临床诊断明确。开始支持治疗;患者在入院24小时内死亡。
讨论
尽管狂犬病在英国较为罕见,但全球每年仍有6万至7万人因此死亡,绝大多数发生在非洲(约35%)和亚洲(约60%)。6 16 在与狂犬病动物接触(且通常伴有创伤)后,病毒在局部增殖。当遇到周围神经末梢时,狂犬病毒与乙酰胆碱受体结合,从而进入神经元细胞。随后病毒主要经逆行轴浆流向中枢传播。最终,病毒在中枢神经系统内持续复制导致炎症和神经元死亡,表现为进行性脑炎和死亡。背根神经节细胞死亡和炎症可能导致入侵部位的疼痛、瘙痒或感觉异常,而病毒顺行播散则导致多种组织感染——尤其包括唾液腺,引起典型的流涎。面部和手部咬伤——两者均为神经密集分布区域——会增加临床疾病的风险,前者常因神经长度较短而潜伏期更短。
在早期临床阶段,仅有非特异性病毒症状,尽管损伤部位的感觉异常和/或瘙痒可能提供狂犬病的早期线索。神经系统疾病表现为约80%患者的“狂躁型”狂犬病,20%为麻痹型(“哑型”)狂犬病。这种二分法的原因尚不清楚,但狂躁型疾病被认为主要源于边缘系统的受累,麻痹型狂犬病则源于脊髓前角感染。17 狂躁型狂犬病晚期也可能出现瘫痪。在狂躁型狂犬病中,意识混乱和严重躁动伴有恐水症,常因看到、听到或——值得注意的是——仅仅想到水而触发剧烈的咽肌痉挛。客观上——如果检查可行——可能存在脑膜刺激征,伴有全身反射亢进和伸性跖反射。通常在数天内(最多)继之昏迷和死亡,但在重症监护下,生存期可超过一个月。
在哑型狂犬病中,出现上行性、进行性瘫痪,通常始于被咬肢体。最终呼吸肌受累。常存在发热和意识混乱,有时出现癫痫发作:诊断通常远不明显,鉴别诊断范围更广。自主神经功能障碍可发生(两种类型均可),且确实可能存在直接心脏受累并伴有心肌炎特征。
如这些病例所示,通常可以做出可靠的临床诊断。在资源丰富的环境中,对四种样本——血清、唾液、脑脊液和颈项皮肤活检——进行免疫学或分子检测可确诊。18 快速荧光灶抑制试验(RFFIT)可检测血清或脑脊液中的狂犬病毒抗体;免疫荧光检测也可显示颈项皮肤活检中的狂犬病抗原。RT-PCR可检测唾液、脑脊液或血清样本,或皮肤活检或(死后)脑组织中的狂犬病毒RNA。这些检测在我们医院环境中均不易获得。
对狂犬病的不熟悉绝不仅限于资源丰富的环境。尽管具有致死性,狂犬病仍被WHO归类为被忽视的热带病19,在许多流行地区,医疗从业者对其认识不足且识别不够,如上文病例2所示。缺乏快速诊断工具和公共卫生报告有限使问题更加复杂。此外,作为主要关注领域且已记录高疗效的预防策略,不幸的是在资源受限环境中许多受害者既无法负担也无法获得。
最近的英国病例证明,对于英国神经科医生而言,熟悉狂犬病的临床识别(框1)及管理基本原则绝非“奢侈知识”,包括暴露后预防的抗狂犬病疫苗方案,以及彻底的伤口清创和清洗(碘酒或酒精),并在适当情况下将人狂犬病免疫球蛋白直接注入伤口。该病例促使英国于2025年6月发布了新的狂犬病管理指南。20–23 适当的管理取决于“综合狂犬病风险”,21 该风险在评估暴露类别后确定——主要考虑伤口严重程度和唾液接触情况、来源国和涉及动物种类22 以确定所需的暴露后治疗(图3)。23 据称,如果在暴露后24小时内实施且执行得当,暴露后预防100%有效。然而,这些病例强调了认识和警惕的必要性。猫咬伤狂犬病极为罕见,但绝非未见报道。24 25
[内容请查看原文]
[内容请查看原文]
狂犬病的警示信号
原因不明的脑炎(尤其适用于“哑型”狂犬病;狂躁型狂犬病较少被漏诊)
任何急性脑炎患者,未找到替代诊断,尤其是有任何动物接触史者,即使轻微或并非近期
脑炎伴进行性瘫痪(同样为“哑型”狂犬病)
快速进展和脑脊液细胞增多应引起怀疑
具有经典狂犬病“警示信号”的神经系统特征:
恐水症(尝试饮水时触发的非自主咽肌痉挛)
恐风症(面部气流触发痉挛)
自主神经不稳定(心动过速、唾液分泌过多、出汗)
躁动、意识模糊、幻觉、谵妄、失眠和癫痫发作在其他脑炎中均相对常见,但至少应考虑到狂犬病的可能性
暴露部位的局部症状
咬伤/抓伤部位的感觉异常、疼痛、瘙痒或感觉迟钝——这是尤为重要的早期线索。
[图:英国卫生安全局暴露后狂犬病管理建议:风险评估与治疗。23 HRIG,h]

[内容请查看原文]
2025年谢菲尔德一名约克郡女性死于狂犬病,这凸显了神经科医生了解狂犬病表现和管理的重要性,即使在非流行区也是如此。
狂犬病的显著特点是病死率几乎为100%。
其典型潜伏期为21至90天,但在10%的病例中超过一年。
[内容请查看原文]
Fooks, A. R. 等。狂犬病。Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017;3:17091. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.91
英国卫生安全局:狂犬病:风险评估与治疗摘要(2025);狂犬病暴露后治疗:管理指南(2025),以及各国陆生动物狂犬病风险(2025),均可在 https://www.gov.uk/health-and-social-care/health-protection-infectious-diseases 获取
Gadre G, Satishchandra P, Mahadevan A, 等。狂犬病毒性脑炎:诊断中的临床决定因素,特别关注瘫痪型。J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010;81:812–20. 10.1136/jnnp.2009.185504
查看英文原文▾
Introduction
Novel forms of encephalitic illness continue to be described—related to channel antibodies,1 COVID-19 (both virus and vaccines),2 3 and new therapeutic agents for malignancies,4 to take just three instances—and occupy much space in the neurological literature and in training curricula. However, long-known encephalitic illnesses continue to exert a major global health impact, and yet often remain totally unfamiliar to practising neurological clinicians. For example, only a very small minority of UK neurologists will ever have encountered a case of one of the most serious and dramatic of the encephalitides, rabies. The sad recent death of a UK national, diagnosed in Yorkshire and the Humber,5 emphasises the need for all of us to have more than passing familiarity with the manifestations of rabies.
Rabies is remarkable for perhaps three particularly unsettling features: it is one of the very few viruses that can infect all mammals6 7; it carries a mortality rate of virtually 100%7–10; and while its incubation period typically lies between 21 and 90 days, in some 10% of the cases it is over a year9—indeed, there are well-documented cases presenting 4–6 years after exposure,11 12 with some reports of an incubation period of well over a decade.7 13–15
Rabies encephalitis is caused by the neurotropic virus of the family Rhabdoviridae, genus Lyssavirus, subgroup rabies virus (figure 1). It is transmitted via saliva that contaminates bites, scratches, wounds and any other form of recent mucosal exposure. Globally, 99% of human cases follow bites from dogs. Other culprit reservoir mammals include foxes, coyotes, cats, raccoons, skunks and bats.8 Here, we present from northern Uganda two cases of African males admitted as emergencies to the same hospital, who both developed rapidly fatal encephalitic rabies following cat bites.
[图:Rabies virus. www.scientificanimations.com/wiki-images/ - http://www.scientificanimations.com/wiki-images/ CC BY-SA 4.0]
Case presentations
Case 1
A man in his late teens with no prior chronic illness presented to the Emergency Department at St Mary’s Hospital, Lacor, northern Uganda (figure 2) with confusion and restlessness. He had severe odynophagia and also a fever for the previous 48 hours. There was no history of voice change, cough, dyspnoea, loss of consciousness or convulsions, and no suggestion of alcohol or illicit drug use. His social history was significant for engaging in hunting activities principally in the local bush and forest. In recent days, he had, while hunting, encountered two cats fighting in a village; he had intervened and sustained a trivial but skin-penetrating cat bite. (The interval between presentation and cat bite was unclear: the patient himself was confused, and different carers gave varying accounts of when the event occurred.)
[图:St Mary’s Hospital, Lacor, northern Uganda.]
On examination, he was confused, with episodes of severe psychomotor agitation—careering around the ward incoherently screaming, extremely distressed and apparently terrified. Marked hydrophobia was apparent. He had features of autonomic dysfunction including drooling of saliva and persistently elevated blood pressures. Local examination of the pharynx was normal, and aside from a tachycardia and hypertension, other body systems were unremarkable.
A full blood count showed mild leucocytosis with neutrophilia, and a blood film was negative for malaria parasites.
Clinically, the impression was that he showed the classical features of encephalitic rabies. The patient was isolated and managed supportively with opioid analgesics (intramuscular tramadol), maintenance intravenous fluids (Ringer’s lactate), and anxiolytics—intravenous diazepam followed later by intramuscular chlorpromazine. However, his encephalitic features progressively worsened; he rapidly developed coma and died 15 hours after admission; resuscitation was not attempted.
Case 2
A man in his late 20s sustained a bite from a wild cat during a visit to Kitgum District, Northern Uganda. The wounds were superficially cleaned at home. He did not seek medical care; he did not receive post-exposure vaccination or rabies immunoglobulin at any point.
Approximately 3 months later, he began visiting local health facilities complaining of persistent itching at the bite site and burning sensations radiating along the affected limb. His wife reported a notable change in his behaviour, with markedly heightened sexual desire. Despite multiple consultations, no suspicion of rabies was raised, and no clinician recommended vaccination.
Some 6 months post-exposure, the patient was rushed to the emergency unit with profuse sweating, hypersalivation, acute urinary retention and severe dysuria. He was initially managed empirically for suspected urosepsis. However, within hours of admission, his condition deteriorated dramatically with the development of pronounced hydrophobia, aggressive behaviour and agitation, rapidly worsening confusion and escalating autonomic instability with blood pressure rising to 171/102 mmHg and a tachycardia of 130–157 bpm. A clinical diagnosis of encephalitic rabies was apparent. Supportive management was instituted; the patient died within 24 hours of admission.
Discussion
While rare in the UK, rabies continues to cause 60–70 000 deaths globally each year, the great majority in Africa (around 35%) and Asia (around 60%).6 16 Following contact with (and usually trauma from) a rabid animal, the virus multiplies locally. On encountering a peripheral nerve terminal, the rabies virus binds to acetylcholine receptors and thereby gains neuronal cell entry. It then travels centrally, mainly through retrograde axoplasmic flow. Eventually, continued viral replication within the central nervous system leads to inflammation and neuronal death, manifesting as progressive encephalitis and death. Dorsal root ganglia cell death and inflammation may contribute to pain, itching or paraesthesia at the site of entry, while anterograde spread of virus results in infection of various tissues—including in particular the salivary glands, causing the classic sialorrhoea. Bites to the face and hands—both densely innervated areas—increase the risk of clinical disease, the former often with shorter incubation periods as a consequence of shorter nerve lengths.
In the early clinical stages, there are only non-specific viral symptoms, although injury site paraesthesiae and/or pruritus may offer early hints of rabies. Neurological disease takes the form of ‘furious’ rabies in some 80% of patients, paralytic (‘dumb’) rabies in 20%. The reasons for this dichotomy are unknown, though furious disease is thought to result from predominant involvement of the limbic system, paralytic rabies from spinal anterior horn infection.17 Paralysis may also occur in the late stages of furious rabies. In furious rabies, confusion and severe agitation are accompanied by hydrophobia, with often dramatic pharyngeal muscle spasms triggered by seeing, hearing or—remarkably—just thinking of water. Objectively—if examination is possible—meningism may be present, with generalised hyper-reflexia and extensor plantar responses. Coma and death commonly follow within a few days (at most), although with intensive care, survival can be over a month.
In dumb rabies, there is an ascending, progressive paralysis, usually starting in the bitten limb. Ultimately, the respiratory musculature becomes involved. Fever and confusion are often present, sometimes seizures: the diagnosis is usually far less obvious, the differential wider. Autonomic dysfunction can occur (in both forms) and indeed, there may be direct cardiac involvement with features of myocarditis.
A confident clinical diagnosis is usually feasible, as in these cases. In resource-rich settings, immunological or molecular tests on four types of samples—serum, saliva, cerebrospinal fluid and a nuchal skin biopsy—can confirm the diagnosis.18 The Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test (RFFIT) can identify rabies virus antibodies in serum or CSF; immunofluorescence testing can also show rabies antigen in nuchal skin biopsies. RT-PCR may disclose rabies RNA in saliva, CSF or serum samples, or in skin biopsies or (post-mortem) brain tissue. None of these was available readily in our hospital setting.
Unfamiliarity with rabies is by no means limited to resource-rich settings. Despite its lethality, rabies is still classified by the WHO as a neglected tropical disease19 that is under-appreciated and under-recognised by healthcare practitioners in many endemic areas, as well-illustrated by Case 2 above. Lack of rapid diagnostic tools and limited public health reporting compounds the problem. Furthermore, preventive strategies that are the main area of focus with documented high efficacy are unfortunately neither affordable nor accessible to many victims in resource-constrained settings.
The recent UK case proves it is by no means ‘luxury knowledge’ for UK-based neurologists to be familiar with the clinical recognition of rabies (box 1), with the basic principles of management, including anti-rabies vaccine protocols for post-exposure prophylaxis, along with vigorous wound debridement and cleaning (iodine or alcohol) and, where appropriate, direct administration of human rabies immune globulin into the wound. The case triggered the release of new UK rabies management guidelines in June 2025.20–23 Appropriate management depends on the ‘composite rabies risk’,21 determined following assessment of the category of exposure—principally considering the wound severity and contact with saliva, the country of origin and animal species involved22 to determine the post-exposure treatment required (figure 3).23 Post-exposure prophylaxis is said to be 100% effective if instituted within 24 hours of exposure, and if properly executed. These cases highlight, however, the need for awareness and vigilance. Cat-bite rabies is extremely uncommon, though by no means unreported.24 25
[内容请查看原文]
[内容请查看原文]
Red flags for rabies
Encephalitis of unclear cause (applies to ‘dumb’ rabies in particular; furious rabies less likely to be missed)
Any patient with acute encephalitis where no alternative diagnosis is found, especially if there is any history of animal exposure, even if minor or not recent
Encephalitis with progressive paralysis (again, ‘dumb’ rabies)
Rapid progression and a CSF pleocytosis should raise suspicion
Neurological features that are the classic rabies ‘red flag’ signs:
Hydrophobia (involuntary pharyngeal spasms triggered by attempts to drink)
Aerophobia (airflow over the face triggering spasms)
Autonomic instability (tachycardia, hypersalivation, sweating)
Agitation, confusion, hallucinations, delirium, insomnia and seizures are all relatively common in other encephalitides, but should at least raise the possibility of rabies
Local symptoms at the exposure site
Paraesthesia, pain, itching or dysaesthesia at the bite/scratch site—a particularly important early clue.
[图:UK Health Security agency recommendations for post-exposure rabies management: risk assessment and treatment. 23 HRIG, h]
[内容请查看原文]
The death in Sheffield from rabies in 2025 of a Yorkshire woman emphasises the importance for neurologists of knowing the manifestations and management of rabies, even where it is non-endemic.
Rabies is remarkable for carrying a mortality rate of virtually 100%.
Its typical incubation period is between 21 and 90 days, but in 10% of the cases, it is over a year.
[内容请查看原文]
Fooks, A. R. et al. Rabies. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017;3:17091. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.91
UK Health Security Agency: Rabies: summary of risk assessment and treatment (2025); Rabies post-exposure treatment: management guidelines (2025), and Rabies risks in terrestrial animals by country (2025), all available at https://www.gov.uk/health-and-social-care/health-protection-infectious-diseases
Gadre G, Satishchandra P, Mahadevan A, et al. Rabies viral encephalitis: clinical determinants in diagnosis with special reference to paralytic form. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010;81:812–20. 10.1136/jnnp.2009.185504
兽研